Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The rock saturation condition affects the rock elastic and strength characteristics due to the role of fluid−rock interaction. However, the role of this parameter has not been studied well for mud−rock exposure during drilling operations. Hence, this study targets to assess the role of different rock saturation conditions on the rock geomechanics changes during the rock exposure for the drilling fluids. During the drilling operation, the mud filtrate invades the drilled formation pore system and replaces the saturating fluid and consequent alterations occur for the rock elastic moduli and failure properties. The current study employed Berea Buff sandstone rock type with different saturation conditions (brine-saturated, dry, and oil-saturated) to interact with drilling mud (water-based) through the filtration test to mimic the downhole rock−mud exposure under pressure, temperature, and time conditions. Extensive laboratory analysis was accomplished that covered the scratching test to get the strength of rock samples, acoustic data determination, elastic moduli evaluation, and scanning electron microscopy to assess the internal alterations of the rock pore system. The obtained results showed that the oil-saturated sample showed the least filtration characteristics for the rock−mud exposure and the best condition to maintain the rock strength from deterioration compared to the dry and brine-saturated samples. The rock strength showed a weakening behavior for the brinesaturated and dry samples by 5 and 18% respectively, while the oil-saturated sample showed only a 2% strength reduction after the mud exposure. Poisson's ratio showed a 21% increase for the brine-saturated sample and the dry sample showed a small increase from 0.2 to 0.22, while the oil-saturated sample maintains a stable Poisson's ratio at 0.24. Young's modulus showed an increase for the dry and brine-saturated rock samples by 10 and 7%, respectively, while a 25% reduction for the oil-saturated. The spectrometry analysis results showed the internal changes in the rock samples' pore system for the brine-saturated and dry samples, while the oilsaturated sample showed no internal changes that maintain the rock structure and strength after the mud exposure.
The rock saturation condition affects the rock elastic and strength characteristics due to the role of fluid−rock interaction. However, the role of this parameter has not been studied well for mud−rock exposure during drilling operations. Hence, this study targets to assess the role of different rock saturation conditions on the rock geomechanics changes during the rock exposure for the drilling fluids. During the drilling operation, the mud filtrate invades the drilled formation pore system and replaces the saturating fluid and consequent alterations occur for the rock elastic moduli and failure properties. The current study employed Berea Buff sandstone rock type with different saturation conditions (brine-saturated, dry, and oil-saturated) to interact with drilling mud (water-based) through the filtration test to mimic the downhole rock−mud exposure under pressure, temperature, and time conditions. Extensive laboratory analysis was accomplished that covered the scratching test to get the strength of rock samples, acoustic data determination, elastic moduli evaluation, and scanning electron microscopy to assess the internal alterations of the rock pore system. The obtained results showed that the oil-saturated sample showed the least filtration characteristics for the rock−mud exposure and the best condition to maintain the rock strength from deterioration compared to the dry and brine-saturated samples. The rock strength showed a weakening behavior for the brinesaturated and dry samples by 5 and 18% respectively, while the oil-saturated sample showed only a 2% strength reduction after the mud exposure. Poisson's ratio showed a 21% increase for the brine-saturated sample and the dry sample showed a small increase from 0.2 to 0.22, while the oil-saturated sample maintains a stable Poisson's ratio at 0.24. Young's modulus showed an increase for the dry and brine-saturated rock samples by 10 and 7%, respectively, while a 25% reduction for the oil-saturated. The spectrometry analysis results showed the internal changes in the rock samples' pore system for the brine-saturated and dry samples, while the oilsaturated sample showed no internal changes that maintain the rock structure and strength after the mud exposure.
This study examined the issues of wellbore instability encountered during the drilling of the vertical exploration Al-Rateena-1 well, Block 25D, Al-Rawat Field, Sudan. Measurements of the wellbore diameter revealed significant damage to the formation interval between 2775 and 2925 m. This damage released approximately 800 barrels of drill cuttings from the affected zone and overlying formations. A comprehensive wellbore stability assessment was conducted to identify the root causes of instability and develop strategies to mitigate future occurrences. The assessment involved a thorough analysis of the pore, vertical, effective vertical, and minimum and maximum horizontal pressures. All of these parameters play a crucial role in maintaining wellbore integrity. This study also evaluated the potential impact of these parameters on groundwater and soil quality, leading to the development of an efficient waste management system. The safe mud weight range for the well was determined to be between 13.5 and 15.5 pounds per gallon (PPG). However, the drilling fluid used during the operation had a significantly lower density of only 10 PPG. This ultimately leads to the collapse of the wellbore wall. Examination of drilling cuttings revealed elevated levels of various heavy metals. These heavy metals included Lead (94.12 ppm), Mercury (62.87 ppm), Nickel (1403 ppm), Copper (343 ppm), Calcium (23132.72 ppm), Magnesium (3700 ppm), and Barium (16000 ppm). These elements pose a significant threat to both surface water and groundwater quality. It is possible that they also contributed to the wellbore wall collapse. It was hypothesized that the interaction between these elements and the water-based drilling fluid or its additives could have triggered the collapse event. The findings of this study highlight the importance of conducting comprehensive wellbore stability assessments before drilling. Such assessments should incorporate detailed investigations, modelling, calculations, and simulations of various parameters that influence wellbore stability. In addition, careful consideration must be given to the potential environmental impacts of drilling fluids and cuttings, particularly in areas with sensitive ecosystems. The wellbore instability in the vertical exploration Al-Rateena-1 well was primarily caused by the use of an underweight drilling fluid. This underweight drilling fluid results in the collapse of the wellbore wall. Elevated levels of heavy metals in drill cuttings suggest a potential impact on groundwater quality. It is also possible that they contributed to the wellbore instability. Comprehensive wellbore stability assessments are essential to prevent similar incidents in the future. This study provides a detailed account of wellbore instability. This includes the identification of root causes and the development of preventive measures. This study also highlights the potential environmental impact of drilling fluids and cuttings. The findings of this study can help improve drilling practices and environmental protection in the oil and gas industry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.