2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of ownership concentration on payout across Nordic firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the DPR proxy FO, the probability is greater than 10% (0.1578 > 0.1), which indicates that high or low FO has no significant effect on DPR. This result supports the research of Khalfan and Wendt (2020) in Norway, as well as that of Jayanti and Puspitasari (2017) and Al-Najjar and Kilincarlsan (2016). It also supports the tax-preference theory, which states that foreign ownership encourages companies to retain profits rather than pay taxes on dividends distributed.…”
Section: Hypothesis Testssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the DPR proxy FO, the probability is greater than 10% (0.1578 > 0.1), which indicates that high or low FO has no significant effect on DPR. This result supports the research of Khalfan and Wendt (2020) in Norway, as well as that of Jayanti and Puspitasari (2017) and Al-Najjar and Kilincarlsan (2016). It also supports the tax-preference theory, which states that foreign ownership encourages companies to retain profits rather than pay taxes on dividends distributed.…”
Section: Hypothesis Testssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our primary measure of ownership concentration is the percentage of the total equity owned by the largest shareholder and 10 largest shareholders. Although beyond the five largest shareholders the ownership structures become rather dispersed, we believe that although decision-making is in the hands of minority shareholders, the proportion of the top 10 shareholders' equity will have a certain rational impact on the top 5 shareholders [105,139].…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this study, considering the company's performance in terms of company size and profitability, operating income, assets, liabilities, and ROA are selected as control variables. In terms of corporate control and ownership concentration, we select the propor-tion of legal person shares and the five largest shareholders (5LOWN) as the corresponding control variables [139]. The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) constitute the A-share market.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions of the analysis done by (Hussain, Rafique, Khalil, & Nawaz, 2013;Musallam et al, 2018) demonstrated that nearly a critical impact of institutional ownership, operating leverage, liquidity on worth of the firm on the performance of an organization. Khalfan and Wendt (2020) looked into that how concentration of ownership affects payment policies and the impact of foreign institutions and state as owners on payout by Nordic companies. Therefore, the effect of concentration of possession on appropriation shifts generally from one country to another, with expanded proprietorship fixation in Finland being more averse to deliver profits and higher possession focus builds the inclination to deliver profits in Denmark and Norway, while higher possession focus builds the penchant to repurchase Norway and Sweden.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%