2017
DOI: 10.17549/gbfr.2017.22.1.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Ownership Structure on Internationalization : An Empirical Study of Korean SMEs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, SMEs with a healthier financial structure are in a better position to increase export Ownership and export performance of SMEs performance, and family-controlled SMEs can reach this result by minimising the use of external equity from nonfamily members. Our work also contributes to the literature by enlarging the academic knowledge about the pros and cons of family ownership towards export performance, including financial moderating variables, because previous studies have generated mixed and inconclusive findings and have very seldom examined SMEs (Cho and Lee, 2017;Nieto, 2005, 2006). In addition, we have focused on Italian SMEs that operate in a bank-oriented financial system where there is a prevalence of bank capital, while the use of other sources of finance, for example, an alternative SME listing, bond markets for SMEs and FINTECH channels, are less developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, SMEs with a healthier financial structure are in a better position to increase export Ownership and export performance of SMEs performance, and family-controlled SMEs can reach this result by minimising the use of external equity from nonfamily members. Our work also contributes to the literature by enlarging the academic knowledge about the pros and cons of family ownership towards export performance, including financial moderating variables, because previous studies have generated mixed and inconclusive findings and have very seldom examined SMEs (Cho and Lee, 2017;Nieto, 2005, 2006). In addition, we have focused on Italian SMEs that operate in a bank-oriented financial system where there is a prevalence of bank capital, while the use of other sources of finance, for example, an alternative SME listing, bond markets for SMEs and FINTECH channels, are less developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Family-controlled firms in Korea prefer strategies that endorse long-term success, even when the recognized risk is high (Hemmert 2018). A highly competitive Korean market as well as a high level of family ownership may thus compel Korean SMEs to invest in explorative innovation and internationalization, as risky strategies cause income uncertainty in the short term but can be highly profitable in the long run (Cho and Lee 2017). Our findings suggest that it may in fact be rewarding for many Korean SMEs to engage aggressively either in explorative innovation or in internationalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We use several control variables besides the main independent variables (Sullivan & Constand, 1996;Larson, Madura, & Akhigbe, 2001;Kim et al, 2010;Cho. & Lee 2017).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%