2015
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyv124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of pain control on physical and psychiatric functions of cancer patients: a nation-wide survey in Taiwan

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of pain in cancer patients at different disease statuses, the impact of pain on physical and psychiatric functions of patients and the satisfaction of pain control of patients at outpatient clinic department in Taiwan.MethodsShort form of the Brief Pain Inventory was used as the outcome questionnaire. Unselected patients of different cancers and different disease statuses at outpatient clinic department were included. The impacts of their current pain control on physical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
22
3
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean age, proportion of primary cancer sites, and prevalence of metastasis were comparable between the two studies (Table ). However, the overall prevalence was significantly lower in our study, whereas the mean pain severity scores were not significantly different between this survey and the 2008 study (Table ). Furthermore, cancer‐specific scores in the present analysis were not significantly different from those in 2008, except for hematologic cancers or lymphomas; patients had significantly higher scores in 2014 than in 2008 3 (3.54 ± 1.91 vs 2.85 ± 1.73, respectively; P = 0.0029).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Mean age, proportion of primary cancer sites, and prevalence of metastasis were comparable between the two studies (Table ). However, the overall prevalence was significantly lower in our study, whereas the mean pain severity scores were not significantly different between this survey and the 2008 study (Table ). Furthermore, cancer‐specific scores in the present analysis were not significantly different from those in 2008, except for hematologic cancers or lymphomas; patients had significantly higher scores in 2014 than in 2008 3 (3.54 ± 1.91 vs 2.85 ± 1.73, respectively; P = 0.0029).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In addition, this study mirrored a similar study conducted in 2008, and the results from both were compared to identify trends. Compared with the 2008 study, a greater proportion of the patients were men in the current study. Mean age, proportion of primary cancer sites, and prevalence of metastasis were comparable between the two studies (Table ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations