2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students' science motivation and achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
100
2
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
100
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…After the Kendall-Tau b correlation test, at significant level 0.05, this present study show that there is no correlation between students' critical thinking and students' motivation (p = 0.081). It means whether students who have high critical thinking level in science is not influenced by their science motivation which in line with the findings of Nikou and Economides (2016) that science motivation has no effect to the test and also supported by Chua (2012). Even the result is in contrast with the research finding by Fahim and Hajimaghsoodi (2014) that motivation has a positive relationship with critical thinking.…”
Section: The Correlation Between Students' Critical Thinking Skill Ansupporting
confidence: 74%
“…After the Kendall-Tau b correlation test, at significant level 0.05, this present study show that there is no correlation between students' critical thinking and students' motivation (p = 0.081). It means whether students who have high critical thinking level in science is not influenced by their science motivation which in line with the findings of Nikou and Economides (2016) that science motivation has no effect to the test and also supported by Chua (2012). Even the result is in contrast with the research finding by Fahim and Hajimaghsoodi (2014) that motivation has a positive relationship with critical thinking.…”
Section: The Correlation Between Students' Critical Thinking Skill Ansupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Measurements of identity attractiveness (three items), social media engagement (five items), and consumer‐social venture identification (five items) were adapted from Hall‐Phillips et al's () scale. Five items measuring self‐determination and personal relevance were adapted from Nikou and Economides (), and six items measuring customer citizenship behaviour were adapted from Yi and Gong (). The full questionnaire appears in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 7-point Likert scale anchored between 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree) was adopted for all constructs except selfdetermination and personal relevance, which was used a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Nikou and Economides (2016), and six items measuring customer citizenship behaviour were adapted from . The full questionnaire appears in Table 2.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most effective test is used to find out and identify the level of understanding of students (Westwood, 2008). By using tests, learning outcomes and the level of understanding of students can be known as part of information that can help improve the learning process Assessment instruments must meet the requirements of substance (content), construction and language and have evidence of empirical validity and produce scores that can be compared between schools, between regions and between nationalities (Mendiknas, 2007). In addition, standard assessment instruments must be valid, reliable, and free from bias elements (Mardapi, Kumaidi & Kartowarigan, 2011 (Jeong, 2012;Nikou & Economides, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%