1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00172-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of patient delay and physician delay on the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
41
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,16,17 Although 73.8% of the cases in our study were aged 51 years and older, age did not influence mortality.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,16,17 Although 73.8% of the cases in our study were aged 51 years and older, age did not influence mortality.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Eldar et al 17 reported worsening macroscopic alterations in the case of hospital admissions later than 48 hours. While the total mean time delay to hospital admission of our patients was 21 hours, it was 54 hours in those in whom mortality occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1][2][3][4]8 The complication rates in the PTGBD group and non-PTGBD groups in this study were 14.0% and 6.8%, respectively. The rate of conversion to open surgery in the studies of Texeira et al, 8 Eldar et al, 3 Lai et al, 2 and Suter and Meyer 4 were relatively high (24%, 28.5%, 22%, and 15.6%, respectively). In the present study, the conversion rate was 8.8% in the PTGBD group and 9.1% in the non-PTGBD group, a difference that was not significant (p=0.956).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[1][2][3][4] The safety 3,5,6 and the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [1][2][3]7 have been studied; generally, the outcomes have been good when laparoscopic cholecystectomy is carried out early. [1][2][3][4][5] In addition, several studies have evaluated laparoscopic cholecystectomy after selective sustained percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for the control of severe inflammation 3,[8][9][10] and improvement of cholecystitis-induced disorders. Especially, Chikamori et al 11 reported on 16 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients with PTGBD who experienced a reduced duration of surgery and a lower rate of conversion to open laparotomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy pa-tients who did not receive PTGBD and also those who underwent delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after conservative therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter underlines the need for early intervention, initiated within 72 hours after onset of symptoms. [27][28][29][30][31][32] Other proposals to decrease conversion and complication rates include percutaneous trans-hepatic gall bladder drainage followed by elective cholecystectomy 11 and laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%