2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0656-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Perceived Treatment Assignment on Smoking Cessation Outcomes Among African-American Smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the experiments showed that participants who believed they received active treatment demonstrated better cognitive performance than those who believed they received the placebo. This is consistent with the association between beliefs and treatment response found in several RCT studies that have asked whether participants believed that they had received the treatment or the placebo (Bausell et al 2005;Colagiuri et al 2009;Dar et al 2005;Lewis et al 1975;McRae et al 2004;Thomas et al 2008), but again this is the first study to show this by experimentally manipulating perceived treatment within a double-blind RCT setting. Importantly, the inclusion of the no treatment control groups in Experiment 2 found that, while positive feedback improved cognitive performance in the double-blind condition, it led to worse performance in the no treatment condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the experiments showed that participants who believed they received active treatment demonstrated better cognitive performance than those who believed they received the placebo. This is consistent with the association between beliefs and treatment response found in several RCT studies that have asked whether participants believed that they had received the treatment or the placebo (Bausell et al 2005;Colagiuri et al 2009;Dar et al 2005;Lewis et al 1975;McRae et al 2004;Thomas et al 2008), but again this is the first study to show this by experimentally manipulating perceived treatment within a double-blind RCT setting. Importantly, the inclusion of the no treatment control groups in Experiment 2 found that, while positive feedback improved cognitive performance in the double-blind condition, it led to worse performance in the no treatment condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The third major advantage was the use of an objective outcome measure since the majority of studies assessing the relationship between perceived treatment and therapeutic outcome have been based on subjective outcomes, including the example described above (Colagiuri et al 2009). In fact, to our knowledge, the only exception to this is Thomas et al (2008); in this study, higher rates of smoking cessation in participants who believed they had received active treatment were verified by assessing carbon monoxide and cotinine plasma levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the findings add to our understanding of perceptions of treatment assignment in smoking cessation clinical trials (Schnoll et al, 2008; Thomas et al, 2008). Smokers’ treatment perceptions may be the result of self-fulfilling treatment expectancies that are formed prior to actual treatment exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, only two studies investigated the impact of perceived treatment assignment on smoking abstinence in doubleblind, randomized, clinical trials of bupropion (Schnoll et al, 2008;Thomas et al, 2008). Both trials included smokers who consumed at least 10 cigarettes per day (cpd).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%