2011
DOI: 10.1177/0963721411415220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Pets on Human Health and Psychological Well-Being

Abstract: Because of extensive media coverage, it is now widely believed that pets enhance their owners’ health, sense of psychological well-being, and longevity. But while some researchers have reported that positive effects accrue from interacting with animals, others have found that the health and happiness of pet owners is no better, and in some cases worse, than that of non–pet owners. I discuss some reasons why studies of the effects of pet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
281
1
18

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
281
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the vast majority believe that owning a dog is physically and psychologically beneficial (e.g., EL-ALAYLI et al 2006;HEADEY and GRABKA 2011;MCCONNELL et al 2011;WELLS 2009), others argue that this widely held belief is unsubstantiated (HERZOG 2011). ARCHER (2011) claims that keeping a pet is maladaptive; it is a byproduct of our adaptive social mechanisms that facilitate parental behavior.…”
Section: Dog Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the vast majority believe that owning a dog is physically and psychologically beneficial (e.g., EL-ALAYLI et al 2006;HEADEY and GRABKA 2011;MCCONNELL et al 2011;WELLS 2009), others argue that this widely held belief is unsubstantiated (HERZOG 2011). ARCHER (2011) claims that keeping a pet is maladaptive; it is a byproduct of our adaptive social mechanisms that facilitate parental behavior.…”
Section: Dog Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While evidence is not conclusive (Barker and Wolen 2008;Herzog 2011;Marino 2012), a number of research studies have documented reductions in stress indicators associated with human-animal interaction (HAI) after exposure to stressful stimuli in clinical and healthy populations, including adult pet owners (Allen et al 1991;Allen, Shykoff and Izzo 2001;Allen, Blascovich and Mendes 2002;Barker et al 2010), patients with cardiovascular disease (Friedmann et al 1980;Friedmann et al 1983;Allen, Shykoff and Izzo 2001;Cole et al 2007;Friedmann et al 2007), psychiatric patients (Barker and Dawson 1998;Barker, Pandurangi and Best 2003;Hoffmann et al 2009), and children in medical settings (Nagengast et al 1997;Hansen et al 1999;Havener et al 2001;Kaminski, Pellino and Wish 2002;Tsai, Friedmann and Thomas 2010). However, few studies have investigated the potential of HAI in relieving exam stress in college students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, limitations and problems with studies in this field are not uncommon. A meta-analysis (Nimer & Lundahl, 2007) found only 29 of 250 studies were methodologically able to meet a minimal standard of rigor (Herzog, 2011). Studies are consistently limited by small sample sizes, inconsistent participant randomisation, selection bias and attrition rates (Kamioka et al, 2014;Morrison, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%