The impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life during and after adjuvant treatment for breast cancer

Manneville, Florian; Rotonda, Christine; Conroy, Thierry; Bonnetain, Franck; Guillemin, Françis; Omorou, Abdou Y.

doi:10.1002/cncr.31108

Cited by 17 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Improvements in medical and behavioural treatments with breast cancer have led to a substantial number of individuals achieving a normal life expectancy . Physical activity (PA) is one such intervention that can reduce breast cancer incidence and improve quality of life (QoL) . PA interventions such as strength and resistance training, aerobic exercise, and brisk walking following breast cancer diagnosis have been shown to be associated with improved survival rates and psychosocial health outcomes, increase levels of PA, and reduce fatigue .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults with breast cancer by physical activity type and mode of participation

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Engaging in physical activity following a diagnosis in breast cancer patients improves both survival rates and psychosocial health outcomes. The factors influencing the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for breast cancer patients remain unclear. This systematic review focuses on two questions: are there differences in outcomes depending on; the mode of physical activity undertaken; and whether group‐based, or individual, programmes are proposed. Methods Five databases were searched (PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Central). Randomised control trials were included if they reported an intervention aiming to increase physical activity amongst breast cancer patients. A total of 1561 records were screened with 17 studies identified for final inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias analysis were undertaken. A meta‐analysis was not possible due to methodological differences between studies. Results Findings indicate no evident differences in outcomes based on exercise mode adopted. There are some indications that group interventions may have additional beneficial outcomes, in comparison to individual interventions, but this conclusion cannot be drawn definitively due to confounds within study designs, lack of group‐based intervention designs, and overall lack of long‐term intervention effects. Conclusions Although there are no indications of negative intervention effects, only 6 of 17 trials demonstrated significant intervention effects were maintained. Greater transparency in reporting of interventions, and research enabling a comparison of physical activity delivery and mode is needed to determine optimum physical activity interventions to maintain patient physical activity and outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults with breast cancer by physical activity type and mode of participation

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…150 min of at least moderate PA per week). In a previous cohort study [36], 15% of breast cancer patients ( n = 466) managed to comply with these recommendations. Considering the fact that patients with factors facilitating PA practice are twice as likely to comply with these recommendations (Odds Ratio = 2), with an alpha risk of 5% and a power of 80%, 660 cancer patients will be included (220 per cancer localization).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological and social determinants of physical activity from diagnosis to remission among French cancer patients (PERTINENCE): protocol for a mixed-method study

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Many effective physical activity (PA) interventions have focused on individual factors or a single theoretical model, limiting our understanding of the determinants of PA practice and their interactions in the cancer trajectory. The present mixed-method study aims to capture social and psychological determinants of PA practice from diagnosis to remission among cancer patients, and to identify key levers for PA practice. Methods/design A nested sequential mixed-method design QUAN (QUAL+QUAL) will be used, with qualitative studies embedded in the quantitative study to broaden our understanding of the determinants of PA practice. The design is sequential, since qualitative data on medical staff will be collected before patient inclusion (Phase 1), followed by quantitative patient data collection lasting one year (Phase 2) and a final qualitative data collection one year after inclusion (Phase 3). Phase 1 will be a case study in the two hospitals involved in the study, exploring knowledge of and support for PA practice among medical staff. Through interviews and documental analyses, the PA support dynamic will be evaluated with regard to PA prescription. Phase 2 will be a one-year observational study among 693 cancer patients. Quantitative medical, social, dispositional and psychological data, PA practices and preferences, will be collected at diagnosis, and six months and one year thereafter. Phase 3 will be a retrospective study, evaluating societal and policy factors, as well as unexpected factors playing a role in PA levels and preferences among cancer patients. For this phase thirty patients will be identified six months after inclusion on the basis of their PA profiles. Quantitative data will provide the main dataset, whilst qualitative data will complete the picture, enabling determinants of PA practice and their interactions to be captured throughout the cancer trajectory. Discussion The present study aims to identify key levers and typical trajectories for PA practice among cancer patients, adapted to different times in the course of cancer and taking into account “what works”, “for whom”, “where” and “how”. The challenge is the tailoring of PA interventions to patients at different times in their cancer trajectory, and the implication of medical staff support. Trial registration Clinical Trial NCT03919149 , 18 April 2019. Prospectively registered.

show abstract

“…Literature have shown benefits of regular physical activity (PA) during and after BC treatment, particularly in terms of improving the quality of life (QoL) (Manneville et al, 2018 ). Several randomized controlled trials have shown that appropriate physical activity (PA) during and after cancer treatment improved patients' QoL (Mishra et al, 2012a , b ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adapted Fencing for Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer: The RIPOSTE Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Omorou

Peiffert

Rotonda

et al. 2022

Front. Sports Act. Living

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionEven if indications for mastectomy have been progressively reduced in loco-regional breast cancer (BC) treatment, the harmful effects of surgery are still numerous and can impact physical and psychological wellbeing of women. The RIPOSTE (Reconstruction, self-Image, Posture, Oncology, “Santé”-Health, Therapy, “Escrime”-Fencing) program aimed to propose adapted fencing to patients with BC. This study aims to investigate the effect and conditions of effectiveness of the RIPOSTE program.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective randomized controlled trial including 24 patients with invasive BC who have just undergone surgery. The study will be proposed to the patient and if interested, the patient will be referred to a sports physician for a medico-sportive evaluation. At the end the evaluation, if the patient meets the inclusion criteria, she will be randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups based on a 1:1 principle: Early RIPOSTE group (receive one fencing session per week for 3 months immediately after their inclusion), Delayed RIPOSTE group (receive one fencing session per week for 3 months but within the 3 months following their inclusion). Patients will be included for 6 months with 3 follow-up times (0, 3, and 6 months) by a sport physician. The primary outcome is the evolution of quality of life score. Secondary outcomes are disability score, fatigue, anxiety-depression, cost-effectiveness and process evaluation.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by a French ethics committee (CPP Sud Méditerranée IV, N°ID-RCB: 2020-A01916-33). Results will be submitted for publication, at scientific conferences and through press releases.Trial RegistrationNCT04627714.

show abstract

The impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life during and after adjuvant treatment for breast cancer

Cited by 17 publications

References 25 publications

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults with breast cancer by physical activity type and mode of participation

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults with breast cancer by physical activity type and mode of participation

Psychological and social determinants of physical activity from diagnosis to remission among French cancer patients (PERTINENCE): protocol for a mixed-method study

Adapted Fencing for Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer: The RIPOSTE Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About