The impact of prehospital time intervals on mortality in moderately and severely injured patients

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Modern trauma systems and emergency medical services aim to reduce prehospital time intervals to achieve optimal outcomes. However, current literature remains inconclusive on the relationship between time to definitive treatment and mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between prehospital time and mortality. METHODS:All moderately and severely injured trauma patients (i.e., patients with an Injury Severity Score of 9 or greater) who were transported from the scene of injury to a trauma center by ground ambulances of the participating emergency medical services between 2015 and 2017 were included. Exposures of interest were total prehospital time, on-scene time, and transport time. Outcomes were 24-hour and 30-day mortality. Generalized linear models including inverse probability weights for several potential confounders were constructed. A generalized additive model was constructed to enable visual inspection of the association. RESULTS:We included 22,525 moderately and severely injured patients. Twenty-four-hour and 30-day mortality were 1.3% and 7.3%, respectively. On-scene time per minute was significantly associated with 24-hour (relative risk [RR], 1.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.018-1.040) and 30-day mortality (RR, 1.013; 1.008-1.017). We found that this association was also present in patients with severe injuries, traumatic brain injury, severe abdominal injury, and stab or gunshot wound. An on-scene time of 20 minutes or longer demonstrated a strong association with 24-hour (RR, 1.797; 1.406-2.296) and 30-day mortality (RR, 1.298;. Total prehospital (24-hour: RR, 0.998; 0.990-1.007; 30-day: RR, 1.000, 0.997-1.004) and transport (24-hour: RR, 0.996; 0.982-1.010; 30-day: RR, 0.995; 0.989-1.001) time were not associated with mortality. CONCLUSION:A prolonged on-scene time is associated with mortality in moderately and severely injured patients, which suggests that a reduced on-scene time may be favorable for these patients. In addition, transport time was found not to be associated with mortality.

Factors associated with EMS on-scene time and its regional difference in road traffic injuries: a population-based observational study

“…Particularly, on-scene time is critical for these conditions, with a delay in definitive treatment leading to poor outcomes [1][2][3][4][5]. For trauma victims, studies have shown that time by minute for treatment is associated with the outcome [6][7][8][9][10]. Several factors account for on-scene time among trauma patients [11][12][13]; however, the actual impact of these factors has not been sufficiently examined.…”

Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on trauma care: a nationwide observational study

“…This increase, in turn, could be a potential cause of the recorded increased mortality because there is compelling evidence that a longer on-scene time is associated with increased mortality [ 34 ]. More specifically, an on-scene time greater than 20 min increases the relative risk of mortality within 24 h by 1.797 (1.406–2.296) compared to those with an on-scene time of less than 20 min [ 34 ]. However, the changes in transportation times found in this study are not indisputable.…”

What trauma patients need: the European dilemma

“…Further introduction, implementation and maintenance within an established system requires active support by the government. In some countries with a mature inclusive trauma system, but without dedicated government support, the primary delivery of multiply injured patients (ISS > 16) to a MTC stagnated to around 50% [23][24][25][26][27]. In contrast, some of the most well developed and organized trauma systems in the world are the result of physicianinitiated, but with far reaching governmental support and financial steering [17,28,29].…”