2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of prevention versus promotion hope on CSR activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(57 reference statements)
7
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the popularity of CSR activities, firms often have little guidance regarding how to effectively communicate such initiatives (Du, Bhattacharya, and Sen, 2010;Kim, Kang, and Mattila, 2012;Schlegelmilch and Pollach, 2005). Our findings indicate that in light of negative information such as a service failure, it is critical that the CSR message is easily understandable by consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the popularity of CSR activities, firms often have little guidance regarding how to effectively communicate such initiatives (Du, Bhattacharya, and Sen, 2010;Kim, Kang, and Mattila, 2012;Schlegelmilch and Pollach, 2005). Our findings indicate that in light of negative information such as a service failure, it is critical that the CSR message is easily understandable by consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Unfortunately, little guidance is available regarding the design of CSR messages (Du, Bhattacharya, and Sen, 2010;Kim, Kang, and Mattila, 2012;Schlegelmilch and Pollach, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottom line here seems to be that a plausible story about intrinsic (other-focused) motives is a prerequisite (Barone et al 2000;Folse et al 2010;Forehand and Grier 2003;Gao and Mattila 2014;Myers et al 2012;Skarmeas and Leonidou 2013;Skarmeas et al 2014), but that stakeholders understand and may even appreciate that there are also extrinsic (self-focused) motives involved (Myers et al 2012;Kim 2014;Kim and Lee 2012;Webb and Mohr 1998). Other studies qualified these findings, suggesting that the differentiation between intrinsic and extrinsic is too coarse-grained (Ellen et al 2006), which perceived honesty about the motives may be equally important as the motives themselves (Forehand and Grier 2003), and that motives may play different roles for different types of CSR activities (Kim et al 2012a). A second variable involves the nature of the CSR activities (proactive versus reactive).…”
Section: Key Factors In Achieving Positive Csr Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While some positive emotions (e.g., pride) might motivate consumers to prefer promotion-focused messages, negative emotions (e.g., shame, guilt) would motivate consumers to prefer prevention-focused messages (Higgins, 1998). In addition, a recent study suggests that message types (preventionfocused vs. promotion-focused) promoting CSR can also impact consumer responses (Kim et al, 2012). As such, exploring additional boundary conditions (emotional dimensions, message type, etc.)…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%