2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1722.2001.tb00086.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Prioritizing Academic Integrity in Business Schools: A Comparative Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Subject University has schools of business and engineering that, according to previous research, enroll students who are among the most likely to cheat in college. In a survey of students at 31 colleges in the United States, 87% of students in business majors reported academic integrity violations (Callahan, Dworkin, & von Dran, 2008). This study further revealed that students planning business careers were more likely to engage in dishonesty than any other occupational category.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Subject University has schools of business and engineering that, according to previous research, enroll students who are among the most likely to cheat in college. In a survey of students at 31 colleges in the United States, 87% of students in business majors reported academic integrity violations (Callahan, Dworkin, & von Dran, 2008). This study further revealed that students planning business careers were more likely to engage in dishonesty than any other occupational category.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Meade (1992) reported that 74% of engineering students admitted to engaging in dishonesty, only superseded by undergraduate business students (87%). Although we do not know for sure the causes of this, students have rationalised their conduct by reference to time pressures and competition (Callahan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evidenced when the researcher asks the factors that cause the subject to give an answer or help his friend in doing the task, the subject then answers "so as not to be opposed by his friend" and "because he was scolded by his friend if not giving an answer". The pressure felt by students' forces them to commit fraud in order to maintain friendships, avoid rejection, or avoid social accusations given by peers (Jiang, Emmerton, & McKauge, 2013;Geddes, 2011;Zimny, Robertson, & Bartoszek, 2008;Callahan, Dworkin, & Dranvon, 2001).…”
Section: Retrieval Of Information About the Tendency Of The Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%