The Impact of Public Health Events on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Chinese Social Media: National Infoveillance Study

Abstract

Background The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented challenges to every country worldwide. A call for global vaccination for COVID-19 plays a pivotal role in the fight against this virus. With the development of COVID-19 vaccines, public willingness to get vaccinated has become an important public health concern, considering the vaccine hesitancy observed worldwide. Social media is powerful in monitoring public attitudes and assess the dissemination, which would provide valuable information for policy makers. Objective This study aimed to investigate the responses of vaccine positivity on social media when major public events (major outbreaks) or major adverse events related to vaccination (COVID-19 or other similar vaccines) were reported. Methods A total of 340,783 vaccine-related posts were captured with the poster’s information on Weibo, the largest social platform in China. After data cleaning, 156,223 posts were included in the subsequent analysis. Using pandas and SnowNLP Python libraries, posts were classified into 2 categories, positive and negative. After model training and sentiment analysis, the proportion of positive posts was computed to measure the public positivity toward the COVID-19 vaccine. Results The positivity toward COVID-19 vaccines in China tends to fluctuate over time in the range of 45.7% to 77.0% and is intuitively correlated with public health events. In terms of gender, males were more positive (70.0% of the time) than females. In terms of region, when regional epidemics arose, not only the region with the epidemic and surrounding regions but also the whole country showed more positive attitudes to varying degrees. When the epidemic subsided temporarily, positivity decreased with varying degrees in each region. Conclusions In China, public positivity toward COVID-19 vaccines fluctuates over time and a regional epidemic or news on social media may cause significant variations in willingness to accept a vaccine. Furthermore, public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination vary from gender and region. It is crucial for policy makers to adjust their policies through the use of positive incentives with prompt responses to pandemic-related news to promote vaccination acceptance.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Middle-Aged and Older Adults in India: A Mixed-Methods Study

“…An important finding of this study was that greater vaccine-hesitant attitudes were found in men when compared to women. This is not consistent with findings in the literature where women were found to be more vaccine-hesitant than men [ 28 - 29 ]. However, this can be attributed to the findings from other studies that reported that women were more adherent to medical recommendations and are more cautious about their health [ 30 ].…”

Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature

“…These results constitute a strong call for policy-makers to adjust vaccination policies rapidly in response to the public health events to promote massive vaccination via dynamic monitoring of public sentiment. 112 Finally, in this systematic review we also observed that data mining and natural language processing techniques proved to be very useful and beneficial in analyzing and understanding public perspectives regarding this critical public health issue and thereby providing meaningful and valuable insights. This is also in line with more emerging research in the literature that was not within the scope of this review, but nevertheless reiterating such notions.…”

The differential impacts of coercive pressure from environmental law and proactive environmental strategy on corporate environmental performance: The case study of a pulp and paper company

“…The emotional score calculated by the method is between 0 and 1. The larger the value is, the more optimistic the news is (Zhang, Feng, et al, 2021).…”