2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of quality filter for RNA-Seq

Abstract: Even high-accuracy sequencing technologies are subject to the influence of quality filters when evaluating RNA-Seq data using the reference approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The depth of coverage was adequate for the needs of the study according to Haas et al (2012) . Sequencing error rates should have occurred in the present study ( Wang et al, 2012 ); however, there was no attempt to eliminate those tRFs with few sequences ( de Sá et al, 2015 ). tRFs with low number of sequences could potentially be spurious results and should be taken into account when interpreting results from this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The depth of coverage was adequate for the needs of the study according to Haas et al (2012) . Sequencing error rates should have occurred in the present study ( Wang et al, 2012 ); however, there was no attempt to eliminate those tRFs with few sequences ( de Sá et al, 2015 ). tRFs with low number of sequences could potentially be spurious results and should be taken into account when interpreting results from this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…With the rapid increase in the quality of RNASeq data over the past several years and the use of technical and biologic replicates, this next-generation sequencing approach will likely soon be thought of to have the same reliability as RT-PCR experiments, the current gold standard for gene expression evaluation (de Sa et al, 2015). While RT-PCR can only be utilized to assess gene expression one gene at a time, RNAseq allows for global transcriptome analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Similarly, the choice of phred quality values is a trade-off between not excluding too many raw reads but retaining as many as possible good quality reads [ 77 ]. The phred-value impacts stronger on resulting quality of RNASeq data than on DNA based genome sequencing and is shown to possibly affect later gene expression results [ 82 ]. Illumina data should be filtered with a phred value of 30 or more, a phred value of 30 allows for an error rate of 99.9% (one erroneous base per 1000 bases can still be a lot depending on the sequence depth).…”
Section: Transcriptome Analysis and Its Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%