The Impact of Redistributive Policies on Inequality in OECD Countries

Abstract

Die Dis cus si on Pape rs die nen einer mög lichst schnel len Ver brei tung von neue ren For schungs arbei ten des ZEW. Die Bei trä ge lie gen in allei ni ger Ver ant wor tung der Auto ren und stel len nicht not wen di ger wei se die Mei nung des ZEW dar.Dis cus si on Papers are inten ded to make results of ZEW research prompt ly avai la ble to other eco no mists in order to encou ra ge dis cus si on and sug gesti ons for revi si ons. The aut hors are sole ly respon si ble for the con tents which do not neces sa ri ly repre sent the opi ni on of the ZEW.The Impact of Redistributive Policies on Inequality in OECD Countries * Philipp Doerrenberg Andreas PeichlFebruary 3, 2014 AbstractDue to behavioral effects triggered by redistributional interventions, it is still an open question whether government policies are able to effectively reduce income inequality. We contribute to this research question by using different country-level data sources to study inequality trends in OECD countries since 1980. We first investigate the development of inequality over time before analyzing the question of whether governments can effectively reduce inequality. Different identification strategies, using fixed effects and instrumental variables models, provide some evidence that governments are capable of reducing income inequality despite countervailing behavioral responses. The effect is stronger for social expenditure policies than for progressive taxation.JEL Classification: D31, D60, H20

Finance, Sustainability and Negative Externalities. An Overview of the European Context

“…The group of financial indicators like: X 4.3 ; X 4.4 ; X 4.5 ; X 4.6 ; X 4.7 refer to development finance and microfinance scope ( Table 2) and overwhelm the social exclusion problems and secure welfare (externalities listed in Table 1; Social pillar). There is evidence that government social expenditure is most effective at reducing inequality [126]. Based on Burchardt and Vizard (2007) approach to social exclusion measurement we selected indicators referring to main domains like: education, health, social life and legal security; taking into account their coherence with Sustainable Education Goals referring to social concerns [127].…”

Trends and gradients in top tax elasticities: cross-country evidence, 1900–2014

“…We have collected information about economic and political factors which could account for some of the influences on top tax elasticities identified in the previous literature (Atkinson and Piketty, 2007;Doerrenberg and Peichl, 2014). These variables include GDP per capita, financial development (sum of bank deposits and stock market capitalization as share of GDP), globalization (2016 KOF index of globalization), trade union density as a percent of employees, technological progress (number of patents per capita), human capital (index based on years of schooling), and public spending.…”

Spillovers from gender equality onto economic equality: Evidence from 162 nations

“…Interestingly, nations with larger governments are linked with greater income inequality in our data set. Larger governments do not necessarily have stronger redistribution policies, and, to the extent they do, the second‐order labour‐market effects and rent‐capturing tendencies may mitigate the impact of these policies on reducing income inequality (Doerrenberg & Peichl, 2012). Our results also suggest that countries that did not have a colonial heritage have less egalitarian outcomes when it comes to income distribution.…”