The impact of regulatory pressure on eco-innovation: The role of eco-motivation and network embeddedness

Jin, Shumo; Wang, Juanru; Zhu, Peiyu

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142749

Cited by 3 publications

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Tracing the Reverse Relationship Among Environmental Benefits, Business Model Innovation, and Eco‐Innovation: Does Cooperation Matter?

Prokop,

Carraresi,

Karman

et al. 2024

Bus Strat Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the direct and reverse relationships among environmental benefits, eco‐innovation, and business model innovation (BMI), emphasizing the role of national and foreign cooperation among firms. We employed a structural equation model using data from the 2014 European Community Innovation Survey (CIS), the most recent survey to include questions on firms' environmental activities and eco‐innovations. We studied 6827 firms from the Czech Republic (2363), Germany (3264), and Greece (1200). Findings confirm reverse relationships between eco‐innovation and BMI and between eco‐innovation and environmental benefits. This study challenges the notion that (foreign) cooperation positively impacts eco‐innovation, highlighting a paradox that warrants further investigation. Additionally, we emphasize the reliance of companies on cooperative partners for BMI. Our results underscore the need for a holistic approach to eco‐innovation in light of increasing global environmental challenges. Practical implications include heightened environmental awareness, adjustments to corporate business models, and enhanced cooperation within the analyzed countries.

show abstract

Tracing the Reverse Relationship Among Environmental Benefits, Business Model Innovation, and Eco‐Innovation: Does Cooperation Matter?

Prokop,

Carraresi,

Karman

et al. 2024

Bus Strat Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Resilient Sustainability Assessment Framework from a Transdisciplinary System-of-Systems Perspective

Bataleblu,

Rauch,

Cochran

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The vital role of extensive information exchange among stakeholders across diverse sectors and the interconnection of various scientific fields with nonhomogeneous technology readiness levels has created a new form of a complex engineering problem in the climate change era. Comprehensive sustainability assessment to enable the realization of needs requires transdisciplinary thinking to achieve systematic solutions that bridge the gap between multiple collaborative systems in a portfolio. Although the principal aim of dedicated sustainability regulations is to force companies to move toward sustainability development, general and non-engineered metrics that have not defined clear thresholds for evaluation have encountered severe challenges regarding implementation and economic viability. Therefore, adopting a transdisciplinary systems engineering approach can address multifaceted challenges like sustainability by overcoming collaboration barriers, and traditional disciplinary limits. This paper systematically reviews sustainability-dictated regulations from a transdisciplinary perspective. Different standards are compared, raised opportunities and challenges are discussed, and future remarks are highlighted. The sustainability problem is analyzed from a transdisciplinary systems engineering lens. Finally, a two-level resilient system sustainability assessment framework is proposed to effectively handle and enhance the resilience of companies’ sustainability development roadmaps by enabling decision makers to find robust and highly reliable solutions regarding sustainable system design. The impact of this research is to create a new insight into addressing climate change which not only assesses the current situation but also considers uncertainty sources that affect decision making for the future.

show abstract

How Institutional Pressures Drive Learning and Memory in Organizations

Cosa

2024

Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter explores how coercive, mimetic, and normative institutional pressures influence organizational learning and memory. It presents a comprehensive framework that elucidates the impact of these pressures on organizational behavior, mainly focusing on how they drive compliance, adaptation, and the adoption of best practices. Coercive pressures enforce legal and ethical standards, mimetic pressures encourage the emulation of successful peers, and normative pressures embed industry norms and values into organizational culture. The chapter integrates key theories and empirical studies to highlight the synergistic effects of these pressures, offering practical insights and research propositions to enhance organizational adaptability and resilience in dynamic environments.

show abstract

The impact of regulatory pressure on eco-innovation: The role of eco-motivation and network embeddedness

Cited by 3 publications

References 82 publications

Tracing the Reverse Relationship Among Environmental Benefits, Business Model Innovation, and Eco‐Innovation: Does Cooperation Matter?

Tracing the Reverse Relationship Among Environmental Benefits, Business Model Innovation, and Eco‐Innovation: Does Cooperation Matter?

Resilient Sustainability Assessment Framework from a Transdisciplinary System-of-Systems Perspective

How Institutional Pressures Drive Learning and Memory in Organizations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About