The impact of responsible gambling framing on people with lived experience of gambling harm

Abstract

BackgroundThe framing of health issues influences how people think about and respond to these topics. Gambling has largely been framed as an issue of personal responsibility, with the gambling industry, governments and some researchers promoting responsible gambling strategies as a way to address gambling harm. While there is evidence that the internalization of personal responsibility can negatively impact gamblers, this study aimed to explore how people who have experienced gambling harm interpret and apply personal responsibility frames and ‘gamble responsibly' messages in their lives.MethodsIn-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom and telephone with 15 gamblers who had been harmed by their own gambling and six affected others who had been harmed by someone else's gambling. This study was informed by public health and critical qualitative approaches to inquiry. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsFour themes were constructed from the data. First, gamblers and affected others generally conceptualized gambling and gambling harm as being the responsibility of the individual because it was perceived as the outcome of individual behavior. Second, they attempted to apply responsibility to their own experience either as gamblers who tried to stop or reduce their gambling, or affected others who felt responsible for helping the gambler in their lives. Third, gamblers and affected others were negatively impacted when it was perceived the gambler could not ‘control' their gambling or had not done enough to take responsibility. Finally, gamblers and affected others recommended responsible gambling strategies be reframed to be more effective at addressing gambling harm.ConclusionThis study provides evidence further supporting research demonstrating that personal responsibility frames may have unintended or negative consequences for gamblers and affected others. It underscores the need to reframe public messages about gambling away from responsible gambling, and toward research-based messages that can complement broader legislative changes and other measures to protect individuals.

Involving Lived Experience in regional efforts to address gambling-related harms: going beyond ‘window dressing’ and ‘tick box exercises’

“…Here, LE relevant to GRH is de ned as 'Having personally experienced the suffering and destructive consequences of gambling related to own or someone else's gambling' [24]. This de nition explicitly includes AOs -people in an individual's social network who are affected by the individual's LE or LE testimony [11,33,41].…”

A healthy state? Geopolitics, health, and safety: A keynote presentation for the European Conference of Law Enforcement and Public Health

“…The alcohol industry desperately tries to attribute the blame for drinking and driving on individuals and presents itself as a force for good, doing anything it can but reduce alcohol consumption on the roads (Hoe et al, 2020). The gambling industry's "responsible gambling" campaigns blame individuals for their feckless behaviour with predictable negative effects on the heavily addicted (Marko et al, 2023).…”