2023
DOI: 10.1002/pam.22480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Reverse Transfer Associate Degrees on Education and Labor Market Outcomes

Abstract: Reverse transfer associate degrees are credentials retroactively awarded to current bachelor's degree seekers, combining four‐year credits with credits previously earned at a community college. Using administrative data from Tennessee, we use a difference‐in‐difference design to compare students before and after receipt of a reverse transfer degree to similar students over time. We find reverse transfer degrees have little impact on students’ academic outcomes (GPA, credits, and bachelor's degree attainment) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While earning an associate's degree and then transferring to a bachelor's program with a year or two worth of existing credit is possible in principle, actually earning a bachelor's degree on this path is rather rare (see discussion inOdle and Russell (2023)), so we do not incorporate this in the model.18 At T , agents receive 1 1−β times the utility of the average annual income earned by individuals with their particular degree attainment status.19 This is smaller than the full sample used in Section 3, but larger than estimation samples that require other covariates and outcome variables (Tables3-5), particularly because the state variables used to construct…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While earning an associate's degree and then transferring to a bachelor's program with a year or two worth of existing credit is possible in principle, actually earning a bachelor's degree on this path is rather rare (see discussion inOdle and Russell (2023)), so we do not incorporate this in the model.18 At T , agents receive 1 1−β times the utility of the average annual income earned by individuals with their particular degree attainment status.19 This is smaller than the full sample used in Section 3, but larger than estimation samples that require other covariates and outcome variables (Tables3-5), particularly because the state variables used to construct…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%