2018
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy197
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Rotavirus Vaccines on Genotype Diversity: A Comprehensive Analysis of 2 Decades of Australian Surveillance Data

Abstract: The increased diversity and differences in genotype dominance observed in states using RotaTeq (G12P[8]), and in states and territories using Rotarix (equine-like G3P[8] and G2P[4]), suggest that these vaccines exert different immunological pressures that influence the diversity of rotavirus strains circulating in Australia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
168
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
11
168
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When larger data sets can be assembled, it will be informative to determine the relationships between differences in vaccination probabilities and rotavirus G and P types based on the type of vaccine (RV1 or RV5) administered. Recently published data from Australia show increased G12P [8] prevalence in states using RV5 and increased G2P [4] and equine G3P [8] prevalence in states and territories using RV1, supporting the idea that the two vaccines apply different selective immunological pressures that influence circulating rotavirus population diversity (81). Modeling suggests that differences in homotypic and heterotypic protection from vaccination can influence genotype selection, particularly for RV1 (82).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When larger data sets can be assembled, it will be informative to determine the relationships between differences in vaccination probabilities and rotavirus G and P types based on the type of vaccine (RV1 or RV5) administered. Recently published data from Australia show increased G12P [8] prevalence in states using RV5 and increased G2P [4] and equine G3P [8] prevalence in states and territories using RV1, supporting the idea that the two vaccines apply different selective immunological pressures that influence circulating rotavirus population diversity (81). Modeling suggests that differences in homotypic and heterotypic protection from vaccination can influence genotype selection, particularly for RV1 (82).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The introduction of RVA vaccines might have globally affected the ecology of RVA infections. In Australia, increased diversity and differences in genotype predominance have been observed: G12P[8] strains in states using RotaTeq and G2P[4] strains and equine‐like G3P[8] strains in states using Rotarix . There is the controversial question of whether vaccination facilitated the emergence of unusual strains including equine‐like G3P[8] strains through selective pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, genotype G2 increased in the state in which RV1 was introduced and G12 increased in the state in which RV5 was introduced, but after that, no definite trends were observed. [26][27][28][29] In Tsu and Ise in Mie prefecture in Japan, the dominant genotype shifted from G3P [8] to G1P [8] and G2P [4] after vaccine introduction. 30 It is therefore clear that no consistent trend in RV genotype changes was observed after the introduction of RV vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%