Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Bone conduction implants enable patients to hear via vibrations transmitted to the skull. The main constraint of current bone conduction implants is their maximum output force level. Stimulating closer to the cochlea is hypothesized to increase efficiency and improve force transfer, addressing this limitation. This study evaluated stimulation at four positions in human cadaveric specimens: the cochlear promontory, the posterior wall of the outer ear canal, the lateral semi-circular canal, and the standard Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid (Baha) location. To assess potential hearing sensation, three objective measures were simultaneously recorded. For intracochlear pressure and promontory velocity, stimulating at the lateral semi-circular canal and promontory results in the highest response, with a gain of up to 20 dB. Ear canal pressure shows less conclusive results, with significant differences at only a few frequencies. These findings suggest that stimulation closer to the cochlea offers higher efficiency, which could benefit patients needing higher output force levels than currently available or those eligible for electro-vibrational stimulation, e.g. a cochlear implant combined with a bone conduction device. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-81505-9.
Bone conduction implants enable patients to hear via vibrations transmitted to the skull. The main constraint of current bone conduction implants is their maximum output force level. Stimulating closer to the cochlea is hypothesized to increase efficiency and improve force transfer, addressing this limitation. This study evaluated stimulation at four positions in human cadaveric specimens: the cochlear promontory, the posterior wall of the outer ear canal, the lateral semi-circular canal, and the standard Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid (Baha) location. To assess potential hearing sensation, three objective measures were simultaneously recorded. For intracochlear pressure and promontory velocity, stimulating at the lateral semi-circular canal and promontory results in the highest response, with a gain of up to 20 dB. Ear canal pressure shows less conclusive results, with significant differences at only a few frequencies. These findings suggest that stimulation closer to the cochlea offers higher efficiency, which could benefit patients needing higher output force levels than currently available or those eligible for electro-vibrational stimulation, e.g. a cochlear implant combined with a bone conduction device. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-81505-9.
Background: Cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion can change the mechanical state of the ear whereby wideband tympanometry absorbance (WBTA) may serve as a sensitive tool to monitor these mechanical changes of the peripheral auditory pathway after CI surgery. In WBTA, the amount of acoustic energy reflected by the tympanic membrane is assessed over a wide frequency range from 226 Hz to 8000 Hz. The objective of this study was to monitor changes in WBTA in CI recipients before and after surgery. Methods: Following otoscopy, WBTA measurements were conducted twice in both ears of 38 standard CI recipients before and in the range of 4 to 15 weeks after CI implantation. Changes from pre- to postoperative absorbance patterns were compared for the implanted as well as the contralateral control ear for six different frequencies (500 Hz, 750 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, 3000 Hz, 4000 Hz). Furthermore, the influence of the time point of the measurement, surgical access, electrode type, sex and side of the implantation were assessed for the implanted and the control ear in a linear mixed model. Results: A significant decrease in WBTA could be observed in the implanted ear when compared with the contralateral control ear for 750 Hz (p < 0.01) and 1000 Hz (p < 0.05). The typical two-peak pattern of WBTA measurements was seen in both ears preoperatively but changed to a one-peak pattern in the newly implanted ear. The linear mixed model showed that not only the cochlear implantation in general but also the insertion through the round window compared to the cochleostomy leads to a decreased absorbance at 750 and 1000 Hz. Conclusions: With WBTA, we were able to detect mechanical changes of the acoustical pathway after CI surgery. The implantation of a CI led to decreased absorbance in the lower frequencies and the two-peak pattern was shifted to a one-peak pattern. The result of the linear mixed model indicates that WBTA can detect mechanical changes due to cochlear implantation not only in the middle ear but also in the inner ear.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.