2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2015.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of seaports on the regional economies in South Korea: Panel evidence from the augmented Solow model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In an analysis of 120 port regions from 13 European countries, Bottasso et al (2014) revealed that ports increase the GDP of regions in which they are located, and also influence neighbouring regions' GDP positively. Park and Seo's (2016) investigation of South Korean port regions found that the container throughput of a port has a positive effect on regional economic growth. Thus, we hypothesise that:…”
Section: H1 (F )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an analysis of 120 port regions from 13 European countries, Bottasso et al (2014) revealed that ports increase the GDP of regions in which they are located, and also influence neighbouring regions' GDP positively. Park and Seo's (2016) investigation of South Korean port regions found that the container throughput of a port has a positive effect on regional economic growth. Thus, we hypothesise that:…”
Section: H1 (F )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a major number of studies have been devoted to investigating the effect of seaport investment on national economic growth. The findings of these studies [1][2][3][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] showed that there is a positive relationship between seaport investment and economic growth. Most previous researchers used a production function approach to estimate the effects of seaport investment infrastructure on economic growth.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seaport is seen as a determinant of the economic growth, it contributes to the development of economic sectors and to the generation of economic benefits [1][2][3]. Political evaluation of economic impacts of a seaport is usually effectuated by the government to motivate the request for public funds for developing the existing infrastructure or to constructing a new seaport or to justify its social costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers on transport development generally emphasise the positive impacts of transport facilities in aggregated terms that can lower transport costs and improve accessibility (Gallup et al, 1999;Limao and Venables, 2001;Harringan and Venables, 2006;Behrens et al, 2009;Jiwittanakulpaisarn et al, 2010;Li and Li, 2013;Tong et al, 2013;Park and Seo, 2016). According to some of the economic geography literature, lower transport costs influence the production decisions of a firm as well as the spatial division of production (Krugman, 1980;Beckmann and Thisse, 1986;Behrens and Picard, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015) illustrate that only road development brings positive effects to regional production while the other transport modes do not show a clear impact on regional economy. Park and Seo (2016) aggregate the impact of seaports on the regional economies in Korea, adopting regional GDP including fishery and agriculture, manufacturing, and service activities. These papers use an aggregated concept of economic growth which, however, prevents them from investigating specific impacts of a port on each manufacturing industry, each establishment, and over different periods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%