“…In terms of individual characteristics, the head of the rural household is generally considered to be the source of household income, and his political pro le and work status can signi cantly reduce the vulnerability of household poverty, and with the growth of age, the impact on income will show an inverted "U"-shaped characteristics [32]; married families, due to the increase in labor force, make per capita income is improved, which has a signi cant positive effect on the income level of the poor [33]; in addition, the higher the education level of the head of the household, the better the understanding and acceptance of new things, which is more conducive to raising the income level and improving the living standard of the family [34]. Similarly, Internet poverty alleviation, as one of the effective ways to narrow the digital divide between urban and rural areas and solve the problem of relative poverty, Internet use signi cantly reduces the probability of farmers falling into relative poverty by affecting their information channels, social capital and human capital [35]. However, considering the high cost of Internet and broadband, the alleviating effect of Internet use on poverty may not be signi cant for areas with low penetration of communication technologies [36].…”