The impact of service category and brand positioning on consumer animosity in the service sector – a social identity signaling perspective

Abstract

Purpose The present research responds to researchers’ calls for more research of consumer animosity on potential boundary conditions (e.g. product categories) and marketing strategies that may mitigate such negative impacts on marketers’ product and/or brand performance, with a special focus on the soft service sector. This paper aims to address the unique characteristics of service internationalization, i.e. cultural embeddedness, hybridized country origins and high consumption visibility, by proposing a social identity signaling model to explain consumer animosity effects in the soft service sector. Design/methodology/approach Two surveys (Pretest with 240 participants and Study 1 with 351 participants) and one experiment (Study 2 with 731 participants) were conducted to empirically test our hypotheses in the Japanese-Chinese relationship context. Findings The stronger the national/cultural symbolism and social expressiveness, the stronger the consumer avoidance for the service category. Then the consumer culture positioning strategy that can mitigate an offending country’s cultural symbolism can reduce consumer avoidance. Originality/value This research introduces two factors that could affect the negative social identity signaling capacity of service categories in the animosity context: the national/cultural symbolism reflecting an offending country and the social expressiveness communicating social identity. In line with the social identity signaling perspective, the present research specifically uses consumer avoidance as the dependent variable to capture the notion that consumers avoid consuming services because they wish to avoid being associated with an offending country that may threaten their in-group social identities.

Impact of social media influencers' credibility on millennial consumers' green purchasing behavior: a concept paper on personal and social identities

“…Furthermore, as Escalas (2012), Yang et al . (2018) and Fong et al. (2021) confirmed that the self-identity of a consumer displays a consistent relationship with their purchasing choices.…”

“…Therefore, academia has been quick to provide insights on green purchasing, where consumers' environmental knowledge and concern, the consumer decision-making process, implications of consumer attitudes and the impact of product attributes as well as previous purchase experiences have an impact on purchasing decisions (Sharma and Foropon, 2018;Costa et al, 2021;Chowdhury and Samuel, 2013;Yadav and Pathak, 2016). Furthermore, as Escalas (2012), Yang et al (2018) and Fong et al (2021) confirmed that the self-identity of a consumer displays a consistent relationship with their purchasing choices. Hence, consumers' purchasing behavior would depend on their personal connection to products developed through self-identity and social pressure, where the consumer needs to maintain a social identity (Escalas, 2012;White et al, 2012).…”

Brand engagement on social media and its impact on brand equity in higher education: integrating the social identity perspective

“…As a result, individuals often behave consistently with these group expectations to maintain their associations with the group and other members (Tajfel et al ., 1979). Marketing research demonstrates that consumers identify with brands that echo and strengthen their self-identities through their engagement with the brand communities (Fong et al ., 2021). Members of brand communities engage in collective behaviors, such as sharing norms, to extol the virtues of their beloved brands and help other brand identifiers (An et al ., 2019).…”

Animosity, preference conflict and consumption context in an international crisis: a normative influence perspective

“…Specifically, we examine the moderating effect of usage in public vs. in private on the relation between anticipated severity of social sanctions arising from consumption and purchase intentions. Public and private usage situations refer to the extent to which a product is predominantly used in private or in public, and thus the degree to which the behavior is visible to others (Davvetas and Diamantopoulos, 2016;Fong et al, 2021;Josiassen and George Assaf, 2013). Public usage denotes conditions where behavioral visibility is at a higher degree, whereas private usage refers to conditions where consumption visibility is at a lower degree.…”

“…That is, consumption visibility (i.e. social visibility of consumption) may exert an impact on consumption decisions (Davvetas and Diamantopoulos, 2016;Fong et al, 2021;Maher and Mady, 2010). In the case of low consumption visibility, the consumer is the only evaluator of the product; whereas, in the case of high consumption visibility, the public are also able to evaluate the product (Josiassen and George Assaf, 2013).…”