For at least 20 years, American universities, political scientists, and college students have each been criticized for holding themselves aloof from public life. This article introduces a pedagogical method -research service-learning (RSL) -and examines whether it can provide a means of integrating scholarly theory with civic practice to enhance student outcomes. In particular, we examine whether a modest dose of RSL in the form of an optional course add-on (the "RSL gateway option") is associated with higher scores on 12 educational and civic measures. We find that the RSL gateway option did not have effects on some important outcomes -such as intellectual engagement, problem solving, and knowledge retention -but it did appear to open students' eyes to future opportunities in academic research and nonprofit and public sector work. The RSL add-on also appears to have helped students make the intellectual link between scholarly theory and the challenges facing volunteers and voluntary organizations.We argue that RSL, in its gateway option formulation, is an administratively feasible pedagogy that can simultaneously help to resolve the relevancy dilemmas facing research universities, political scientists, and students seeking connections between the classroom and public policy. said to produce research without regard for its practical applications (Boyer 1994;Boyer 1990).Incentive structures governing faculty promotion and tenure are said to isolate professors from their students and communities (Boyer 1990). Students are said to be uninspired and unable to connect their academic studies to the world around them (Colby et al. 2003). And the universities themselves are accused of being timid about creating model partnerships with community organizations (Maurrasse 2001). As Maurrasse concedes, "Many residents of communities in close proximity to these universities would argue that their powerful neighbors have done more harm than good" (2001,(12)(13). Research universities have been especially vulnerable to these critiques.As a disciplinary microcosm of American higher education, political science has been subject to a similar set of critiques. Critics, including many prominent political scientists themselves, charge that the discipline has prioritized abstract formal theory (i.e., mathematical modeling) at the expense of empirical investigations of political reality (Shapiro 2002;Miller 2001;Kasza 2001;Cohn 1999;Green and Shapiro 1994). Political scientists are said to have abandoned their hallowed tradition of public service and engagement with the policy-making process (Cohn 1999) and turned away from important questions of democracy and public policy (Hacker and Pierson 2009;Shapiro 2002;Green and Shapiro 1994;Cohn 1999). Considering academia's ambivalence about its public mission, it is perhaps not surprising that many college students see public affairs as largely irrelevant to their lives. To be sure, youngResearch Service-Learning 4 people are exceptionally committed to volunteer service (Dalton 200...