2023
DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of similarity metrics on cell-type clustering in highly multiplexed in situ imaging cytometry data

Elijah Willie,
Pengyi Yang,
Ellis Patrick

Abstract: Highly multiplexed in situ imaging cytometry assays have enabled researchers to scrutinize cellular systems at an unprecedented level. With the capability of these assays to simultaneously profile the spatial distribution and molecular features of many cells, unsupervised machine learning, and in particular clustering algorithms, have become indispensable for identifying cell types and subsets based on these molecular features. The most widely used clustering approaches applied to these novel technologies were… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intensity values of various markers were square root transformed and normalized by trimming the mean to the 99 th quantile for each marker and regressing out the first principal component across all markers. Unbiased clustering was performed by applying the FuseSOM package (34) to the normalized intensity values of CD20, CD31, podoplanin, CD66, FXIIIA, CD14, CD3, CD4, CD8a, CD56, CD11c, MPO, CD45, panCK, p40 and FoxP3. This grouped similar immune, stromal, or squamous cell subgroups within the collated HNmSCC specimens.…”
Section: Unbiased Clustering and Spatial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity values of various markers were square root transformed and normalized by trimming the mean to the 99 th quantile for each marker and regressing out the first principal component across all markers. Unbiased clustering was performed by applying the FuseSOM package (34) to the normalized intensity values of CD20, CD31, podoplanin, CD66, FXIIIA, CD14, CD3, CD4, CD8a, CD56, CD11c, MPO, CD45, panCK, p40 and FoxP3. This grouped similar immune, stromal, or squamous cell subgroups within the collated HNmSCC specimens.…”
Section: Unbiased Clustering and Spatial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%