2001
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1404_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Situational and Dispositional Achievement Goals on Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the view that individuals may be more intrinsically motivated in environments matching their achievement goals (Jagacinski, Madden, & Reider, 2001), and hence they may experience more pleasant psychobiosocial states (Bortoli et al, 2009). According to this contention, pleasant psychobiosocial states, including cognition (''convinced, resolute, purposeful'') and motivation (''involved, determined, committed''), of high task-oriented participants evaluated as competent were shown to decrease in conditions of high performance climate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This finding is consistent with the view that individuals may be more intrinsically motivated in environments matching their achievement goals (Jagacinski, Madden, & Reider, 2001), and hence they may experience more pleasant psychobiosocial states (Bortoli et al, 2009). According to this contention, pleasant psychobiosocial states, including cognition (''convinced, resolute, purposeful'') and motivation (''involved, determined, committed''), of high task-oriented participants evaluated as competent were shown to decrease in conditions of high performance climate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Results are also coherent with the "matching hypothesis", which suggests that individuals engaged in environments consistent with their own achievement goals are likely to experience pleasant states and be intrinsically motivated, while also displaying more self-determined forms of behavioural regulation (Jagacinski, Madden, & Reider, 2001). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Time pressure is a dichotomous variable as well ("yes" vs. "no"). If yes, there was a strict limit (which did not exceed 45 min) within which the task needed to be performed (e.g., Elliot et al, 2005;Jagacinski, Madden, & Reider, 2001;Senko & Harackiewicz, 2005;Van Yperen et al, 2009). In case of no time pressure, participants were allowed ample time for the task (Schunk, 1996), or no time limit was mentioned (e.g., Bereby-Meyer & Kaplan, 2005).…”
Section: Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%