2016
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201600235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Size and Loading Direction on the Strength of Architected Lattice Materials

Abstract: Lattice materials are strong yet light. Miniaturizing the pattern size to the micro‐scale allows exploiting mechanical size effects. So far, the impact of the lattice size on the strength has not been studied systematically and mechanical characterization has been focused on compression tests only. Here, the strength of polymer–alumina core–shell composite microlattices with different pattern sizes is investigated in compression and tension. The compressive strength increases by a factor of two when the lattic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure a–c shows snapshots of micro‐/nanolattices during uniaxial tensile tests, and Figure d presents a plot of the specific tensile strength versus relative density of several micro‐/nanolattices. The results reveal that micro‐/nanolattices attain high specific strengths under tensile loading at ultralow densities, which is higher than those of various natural materials, foams, and honeycombs (Figure d) . For example, hollow‐tube alumina nanolattices with an octet‐truss geometry achieve a high specific tensile strength of 146 MPa g −1 cm 3 at a relative density of 6.5% .…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviors and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure a–c shows snapshots of micro‐/nanolattices during uniaxial tensile tests, and Figure d presents a plot of the specific tensile strength versus relative density of several micro‐/nanolattices. The results reveal that micro‐/nanolattices attain high specific strengths under tensile loading at ultralow densities, which is higher than those of various natural materials, foams, and honeycombs (Figure d) . For example, hollow‐tube alumina nanolattices with an octet‐truss geometry achieve a high specific tensile strength of 146 MPa g −1 cm 3 at a relative density of 6.5% .…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviors and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reproduced with permission . Copyright 2014, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. Reproduced with permission . Copyright 2016, Wiley‐VCH.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations