2014
DOI: 10.1002/hec.3108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Smoking Bans on Smoking and Consumer Behavior: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Switzerland

Abstract: In this paper, we exploit the progressive implementation of smoking bans in public venues at the state level in Switzerland to evaluate both the direct effects on smoking and the potential unintended consequences of these legislations on consumer behaviors as measured by visiting restaurants/bars and discos ('going out'). Our results indicate that public venue smoking bans in Switzerland reduce smoking rates, but the findings do not emerge until 1 year following the ban. This pattern of results is consistent w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, we do not find any reduction in smoking prevalence or intensity. Such evidence is consistent with Boes, Marti, and Maclean (2015) who find that the Swiss smoking bans reduced the smoking rates only in the medium term (after 1 year). All in all, our results point out that the reduction in AMI hospitalizations should be attributable to a reduction in ETS exposure and not to a reduction in smoking consumption.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, we do not find any reduction in smoking prevalence or intensity. Such evidence is consistent with Boes, Marti, and Maclean (2015) who find that the Swiss smoking bans reduced the smoking rates only in the medium term (after 1 year). All in all, our results point out that the reduction in AMI hospitalizations should be attributable to a reduction in ETS exposure and not to a reduction in smoking consumption.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is difficult, ex ante, to predict whether this might upward or downward bias the estimated effect on hospitalizations after the ban. However, Boes et al () show that the smoking ban did not affect much the location where Swiss people used to spend their time. Therefore, we do not think that the exclusion of such information leads to a substantially bias in the estimated impact of the policy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Buonanno investigated the influence of the smoking ban on tobacco use reduction in Italy (Buonanno, 2013). Boes reported on the smoking ban's influence in Switzerland (Boes, 2015). Currie evaluated smoking cessation in Ireland (Currie, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Switzerland's natural experiment-progressive implementation of smoking bans in public venues at a state level-was found to reduce the prevalence of smoking by 1% a year after the implementation (Boes, Marti, & Maclean, 2015). Switzerland's natural experiment-progressive implementation of smoking bans in public venues at a state level-was found to reduce the prevalence of smoking by 1% a year after the implementation (Boes, Marti, & Maclean, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the impact of smoking bans, however, have provided inconclusive evidence of their effects on smoking rates. Switzerland's natural experiment-progressive implementation of smoking bans in public venues at a state level-was found to reduce the prevalence of smoking by 1% a year after the implementation (Boes, Marti, & Maclean, 2015). Anger, Kvasnicka, and Siedler (2011) reported that, after the implementation of state-level public smoking ban in bars, restaurants, and dance clubs in Germany, the prevalence of smoking among people who often go out to such places fell significantly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%