OBJECTIVE -To assess the absorption profile of inhaled insulin in healthy, actively smoking subjects at baseline, after smoking cessation, and after smoking resumption and compare it with nonsmoking subjects.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Insulin pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics were measured in 20 male smoking subjects (10 -20 cigarettes/day) and 10 matched nonsmoking subjects after receiving inhaled insulin (1 mg) or the approximate subcutaneous insulin equivalent (3 units) in a randomized cross-over fashion. All smokers then received inhaled insulin 12 h, 3 days, and 7 days into a smoking cessation period. They then resumed smoking for 2-3 days before again receiving inhaled insulin 1 h after the last cigarette.RESULTS -Before smoking cessation, maximum insulin concentration (C max ) and area under the curve (AUC) for insulin concentration time (AUC-Insulin 0 -360 ) with inhaled insulin were higher, and time to C max (t max ) shorter, in smokers than nonsmokers (C max 26.8 vs. 9.7 U/ml; AUC-Insulin 0 -360 2,583 vs. 1,645 U ⅐ ml Ϫ1 ⅐ min Ϫ1 ; t max 20 vs. 53 min, respectively; all P Ͻ 0.05), whereas with subcutaneous insulin, systemic exposure was unchanged (AUCInsulin 0 -360 2,324 vs. 2,269 U ⅐ ml Ϫ1 ⅐ min Ϫ1 ; P ϭ NS). After smoking cessation, AUCInsulin 0 -360 decreased with inhaled insulin by up to 50% within 1 week and approached nonsmoker levels. C max decreased and t max increased relative to baseline but were still not comparable with nonsmoker values. Smoking resumption completely reversed the effect of smoking cessation. Glucodynamics corroborated the observed findings in insulin pharmacokinetics.CONCLUSIONS -Cessation and resumption of smoking greatly altered the pharmacokinetics of inhaled insulin. As rapid changes in systemic insulin exposure increase hypoglycemia risk, inhaled insulin should not be used in people with diabetes who choose to continue smoking. This is consistent with recommendations that people with diabetes refrain from smoking altogether.
Diabetes Care 29:277-282, 2006I nhaled insulin is being developed as an alternative method of insulin administration. It has a faster onset of action than either regular human insulin or insulin lispro injected subcutaneously but retains a duration of action that is longer than that of short-acting analogs of human insulin (1). These characteristics suggest that inhaled insulin is suitable for prandial insulin supplementation in patients with diabetes. Accordingly, the results of large-scale clinical trials show that inhaled insulin is effective and well tolerated in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and that it may prove to be a novel and well-accepted component of diabetes therapy for many patients (2-5). In long-term extension trials, Ͼ80% of insulin-treated patients preferred an inhaled insulin regimen over standard subc u t a n e o u s i n s u l i n t h e r a p y ( 6 ) . Furthermore, the availability of inhaled insulin could, in theory, help to overcome patient aversion to insulin therapy in general (7).Pulmonary permeability determi...