2013
DOI: 10.1111/j.1813-6982.2012.01337.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Social Housing Developments on Nearby Property Prices: a Nelson Mandela Bay Case Study

Abstract: Social housing projects often face substantial “Not‐in‐my‐backyard” (NIMBY) sentiment and, as a result, are frequently plagued by local opposition from communities who argue that nearby property prices will be affected adversely by these developments. International hedonic pricing studies conducted have, however, produced mixed results with some concluding that social housing developments may in fact lead to an improvement in surrounding property values. There is, however, a paucity of South African evidence. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue that this phenomenon is due to the social stigma usually assigned to such places. This finding is corroborated by previous works that found significant relationships between house prices discounts and proximity to social housing estates [56,57].…”
Section: Interpretationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We argue that this phenomenon is due to the social stigma usually assigned to such places. This finding is corroborated by previous works that found significant relationships between house prices discounts and proximity to social housing estates [56,57].…”
Section: Interpretationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The Swedish capital of Stockholm is no exception. Research evidence thus far is mixed, with some studies showing that infill development projects lead to a positive impact on property prices (Ding et al, 2000;Ellen and Voicu, 2006;Kurvinen and Vihola, 2016;Ooi and Le, 2013;Simons et al, 1998); others find a negative impact (Du Preez and Sale, 2013;Funderburg and MacDonald, 2010;Wiley, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%