2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of socioeconomic characteristics and land use patterns on household vehicle ownership and energy consumption in an urban area with insufficient public transport service – A case study of metro Manila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other side, households in the urban areas may own fewer cars if the public transit networks are well-developed. Previous studies found that people incline to have fewer cars if they are living in a high-density built environment [16,37].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other side, households in the urban areas may own fewer cars if the public transit networks are well-developed. Previous studies found that people incline to have fewer cars if they are living in a high-density built environment [16,37].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature indicated that the car ownership level is positively related to household income [34,35]. Rith et al [16] pointed out that, as compared with the other socio-economic attributes, household income is found as the main factor of household car ownership. House ownership status is measured by a dummy variable, valued at 1 if the house is owner occupied and 0 otherwise.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, a good transport facility leads to less demand of automobiles. Improvement of public transport and reduction in distance to the nearest railway station leads to less dependence on private vehicles (Rith et al , 2019). A well-planned metro network leads to decrease in private vehicle ownership by 2% ∼ 3% (Mulalic et al , 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%