Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction Spinal low-grade gliomas (sLGGs) are a group of tumors that arise from glial cells in the spinal cord. Current evidence supporting the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for the management of sLGG is lacking. We hence aimed to compare overall survival rates in patients receiving surgery alone with those receiving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. Methods The NCDB, a large, nationwide, US-based cancer registry was used. Relevant cases were identified using the following ICD-O-3 histological codes: 9382, 9384, 9400, 9410, 9411, 9420, 9421, 9424, 9425, and 9450, along with the ICD-O-3 topographical codes for spinal meninges (C70.1) and spinal cord (C72.0), excluding spinal ependymomas. Overall survival was the primary outcome. Propensity score matching 1:1 was used to balance the cohorts prior to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results A total of 552 patients were included in the study, with 440 in the surgery alone group and 156 in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group. Patients in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group were significantly older (median age 40.0 vs. 24.0 years, p < 0.001), and exhibited higher proportions of WHO grade 2 tumors (p < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently administered in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group (23% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Overall, adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved survival, with a significantly higher mortality in the radiotherapy group before propensity score matching (p < 0.0001). After matching, the difference in overall survival was no longer significant (p = 0.11). Conclusion This study found no significant overall survival benefit associated with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for spinal low-grade gliomas (sLGG). Although patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy initially demonstrated higher mortality rates, this difference was largely due to confounding factors such as more advanced disease in this group.
Introduction Spinal low-grade gliomas (sLGGs) are a group of tumors that arise from glial cells in the spinal cord. Current evidence supporting the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for the management of sLGG is lacking. We hence aimed to compare overall survival rates in patients receiving surgery alone with those receiving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. Methods The NCDB, a large, nationwide, US-based cancer registry was used. Relevant cases were identified using the following ICD-O-3 histological codes: 9382, 9384, 9400, 9410, 9411, 9420, 9421, 9424, 9425, and 9450, along with the ICD-O-3 topographical codes for spinal meninges (C70.1) and spinal cord (C72.0), excluding spinal ependymomas. Overall survival was the primary outcome. Propensity score matching 1:1 was used to balance the cohorts prior to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results A total of 552 patients were included in the study, with 440 in the surgery alone group and 156 in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group. Patients in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group were significantly older (median age 40.0 vs. 24.0 years, p < 0.001), and exhibited higher proportions of WHO grade 2 tumors (p < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently administered in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group (23% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Overall, adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved survival, with a significantly higher mortality in the radiotherapy group before propensity score matching (p < 0.0001). After matching, the difference in overall survival was no longer significant (p = 0.11). Conclusion This study found no significant overall survival benefit associated with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for spinal low-grade gliomas (sLGG). Although patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy initially demonstrated higher mortality rates, this difference was largely due to confounding factors such as more advanced disease in this group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.