2018
DOI: 10.18047/poljo.24.2.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of subsidies on agricultural income in The Republic of Croatia

Abstract: Pregledni znanstveni članak Scientific review SAŽETAK Uspostava FADN sustava u Hrvatskoj omogućila je procjenu važnosti potpora za prihod poljoprivrednih proizvođača. Niski i nestabilni dohoci poljoprivrednih gospodarstava bili su glavni razlog za veliku državnu intervenciju na poljoprivrednome tržištu i transfere dohotka poljoprivrednicima. Prema analiziranim podacima, potpore imaju najveću važnost za tipove: govedarstvo, ovčarstvo i kozarstvo i mliječno govedarstvo, dok su o potporama najmanje ovisna povrćar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common causes for a reduced number of plants per unit area are reduced field germination and agrotechnics such as sowing time, poor seedbed preparation, but also the destruction of plants through cultivating. There are several factors biotic (weediness, and pests attack) and abiotic factors (excessive rainfall, and drought stress) which can also reduce the plant number per unit area [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Several researchers had focus on the same subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common causes for a reduced number of plants per unit area are reduced field germination and agrotechnics such as sowing time, poor seedbed preparation, but also the destruction of plants through cultivating. There are several factors biotic (weediness, and pests attack) and abiotic factors (excessive rainfall, and drought stress) which can also reduce the plant number per unit area [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Several researchers had focus on the same subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%