2018
DOI: 10.1080/1533015x.2018.1427011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of subtle anthropomorphism on gender differences in learning conservation ecology in Indonesian school children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students in the present study, despite living in different regions of Indonesia, showed improvements in their knowledge about slow lorises in response to the same curriculum. Building on Nekaris et al (2018) and McCabe and Nekaris (2018), this study indicates the adaptability of a well-designed educational storybook to teach a wide range of students about a threatened taxon native to their country, and offers insight into how similar environmental education curricula could be created for other multi-site programmes. We thus concur with previous studies that highlight F = factor scores generated in UCINET; WA = wild animal; NG = Nature general; LS = loris sociality; LE = loris ecology; FE = feeding ecology (loris); LA = loris anatomy; LC = loris conservation; IE = incorrect ecology; DE = domestic environment; DA = domestic animal; EF = ecosystem function; AQ = Aquatic; LG = loris general; LH = loris habitat/region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Students in the present study, despite living in different regions of Indonesia, showed improvements in their knowledge about slow lorises in response to the same curriculum. Building on Nekaris et al (2018) and McCabe and Nekaris (2018), this study indicates the adaptability of a well-designed educational storybook to teach a wide range of students about a threatened taxon native to their country, and offers insight into how similar environmental education curricula could be created for other multi-site programmes. We thus concur with previous studies that highlight F = factor scores generated in UCINET; WA = wild animal; NG = Nature general; LS = loris sociality; LE = loris ecology; FE = feeding ecology (loris); LA = loris anatomy; LC = loris conservation; IE = incorrect ecology; DE = domestic environment; DA = domestic animal; EF = ecosystem function; AQ = Aquatic; LG = loris general; LH = loris habitat/region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Future generations can adopt good conservation habits by receiving a good education. Altered to more appropriate ecological terminology from human adjectives in females and verbs in males can increasing knowledge and empathy in educational initiatives (McCabe & Nekaris, 2019). Therapy that focuses on emotion was less successful in reducing aggressive conduct than therapy that promotes forgiveness.…”
Section: Affective Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activities such as games have the potential to mobilize knowledge and conservation action by allowing children to model future adult conservation behaviors and by allowing adults to improve their skills in a low-risk setting [82]. Storybooks have also been used as a tool in Cambodia to introduce children to local endangered animals [25], and using subtle anthropomorphism in such stories can help children increase empathy and environmental knowledge [83].…”
Section: Print Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%