The impact of sustainability in coffee production on consumers’ willingness to pay–new evidence from the field of ethical consumption

Lingnau, Volker; Fuchs, Florian; Beham, Florian

doi:10.1007/s00187-019-00276-x

Cited by 26 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 95 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the financial crisis of 2008/09, many reform initiatives on sustainable corporate governance and sustainable management control were discussed and finalised from an international perspective (e.g., Feder and Weißenberger 2019;Ghosh et al 2019;Johnstone 2019;Lingnau et al 2019). Boards of directors are motivated to engage in implementing a sustainability management system and increasing their sustainability expertise.…”

Section: Discussion and Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding increased research on business case(s) for CSR (Reinhardt et al 2020;Salzmann et al 2005), firm value substantially may be affected negatively through damage to firm reputation as a consequence of corporate irresponsibility. Sustainable management control regarding CSR-related board expertise represents a strategy to decrease conflicts of interest between management and different stakeholder groups, and to strengthen firm reputation (e.g., Feder and Weißenberger 2019;Ghosh et al 2019;Johnstone 2019;Lingnau et al 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although an increasing amount of empirical research has been linked to the impact of management control and governance on corporate social responsibility (CSR) issues since the financial crisis of 2008/09, heterogeneous results have characterised this research field. Regarding the group level of corporate governance, the efficacy of board committees (e.g., audit, compensation or CSR committees) has been included in recent research designs. However, analyses of corporate governance at the individual level are related to the effects of top management members [e.g., chief executive officer (CEO), chief financial officer (CFO) or chief sustainability officer (CSO)] on CSR outcomes. This paper aims to convey a detailed understanding of sustainable management control’s impact as CSR-related board expertise. In more detail, we focus on the influence of both CSR committees and CSOs on three CSR measures mainly analysed in empirical-quantitative research: (1) CSR reporting; (2) CSR assurance (CSRA); and (3) CSR performance. We motivate our analysis with increased relevance from practical, regulatory and research perspectives, and we employ a systematic literature review of the symbolic vs. substantive effects of sustainability-related board composition. Based on our theoretical model (legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and upper-echelons theory), we selected 48 quantitative peer-reviewed empirical studies on this research topic. Our analysis shows that CSR committees positively influence CSR reporting and performance. Thus, there are indications that the implementation of a CSR committee is not a symbolic act, but instead substantively contributes to CSR activities. However, in light of inconclusive empirical research results and a lack of studies that have analysed CSO-related effects, a notable research gap has been identified. Moreover, we note the main limitations of prior research in this review and develop an agenda with useful recommendations for future studies.

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similarly, in choosing products across different brands, consumers' negative attitudes toward brands' unethical behavior exert a stronger effect on their ultimate choice than consumers' positive attitudes toward brands' ethical behaviors (Schamp et al, 2019). Similarly, consumers' negative attitudes toward a company's unethical behavior impact willingness to pay for relevant products more than their positive attitudes toward the company's ethical behavior do (Folkes & Kamins, 1999;Lingnau et al, 2019;Moosmayer, 2012). In fact, whereas a firm's single unethical behavior can moralize a consumer's negative attitude toward the company, ethical behaviors do not moralize positive attitudes to the same extent (Brunk & Blümelhuber, 2011;Lichtenstein et al, 2007).…”

Section: Negatively Valenced Attitudesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do consumers care about morality? A review and framework for understanding morality's marketplace influence

Philipp-Muller

Teeny

Petty

2021

Consumer Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are many ways consumers' morality has been shown to impact their marketplace behavior. We present a theoretical framework for how to conceive of and study marketplace morality in an attempt to unify these disparate findings. First, we describe two common conceptualizations of marketplace morality: (a) the attributelevel approach (where a product attribute fits within a category that is normatively considered moral) and (b) the person-level approach (where consumers differ in the extent to which they dispositionally value morality). We then introduce a third conceptualization: (c) the attitude-level approach (where consumers differ in the extent to which they see their relevant attitude as based in their morality). Through this approach, we demonstrate morality's predictive utility for consumers' marketplace behaviors and help explain why other research could have found mixed evidence for

show abstract

“…The carbon footprint result of 1-year average productivity showed that the conventional intensive (0.935 kg CO2e y la emergética (De Muner et al 2015;Giannetti et al 2011) para evaluar la sostenibilidad del cultivo de café. En segundo lugar, la dimensión más evaluada en cuanto a la sostenibilidad es la económica (5 artículos), las mismas se realizaron a partir de la aplicación de encuestas y entrevistas (Do et al 2019;Lingnau et al 2019)having experience of over eight years in the field of various coffee industries in Vietnam, was created to give scores to multiple parameters. Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS, análisis económico de costo beneficio (Anh et al, 2019;Villavicencio-Enríquez, 2012), y simulación a partir de costos asociados a certificación (Latynskiy & Berger, 2017).…”

Section: Extracción Y Síntesis De La Informaciónunclassified

Sostenibilidad del café: revisión sistemática de la literatura

Trigoso¹,

Valderrama²,

Trujillo³

et al. 2021

RVG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar la evolución y las tendencias de investigación respecto a la evaluación de la sostenibilidad del café. Desde el plano metodológico, se realiza una revisión sistemática de la literatura durante el periodo comprendido entre los años 2010 al 2020. Se consideran artículos redactados en idioma inglés en tres bases de datos: Scopus, Science Direct y Springer Link, después de aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión se analizaron 33 documentos, se encontró que existe una tendencia creciente en el estudio de la temática, los estudios son desarrollados principalmente en los países de Brasil, Vietnam, Uganda y Colombia; los principales medios de difusión son Sustainability (Switzerland), Ecological Economics, y Agricultural Systems. Se concluye que la evaluación de la sostenibilidad del café ha sido abordada principalmente a partir del marco de evaluación SAFA de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO), como método el de análisis de ciclo de vida (ACV), y como técnica a la encuesta, demostrando además gran potencial para el estudio de esta temática la aplicación de Análisis Envolvente de Datos (DEA) y el Modelado Matemático Basado en Agentes (MPMAS).

show abstract

The impact of sustainability in coffee production on consumers’ willingness to pay–new evidence from the field of ethical consumption

Cited by 26 publications

References 95 publications

Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings

Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings

Do consumers care about morality? A review and framework for understanding morality's marketplace influence

Sostenibilidad del café: revisión sistemática de la literatura

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About