2013
DOI: 10.1177/1043463113504448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of teachers’ expectations on students’ educational opportunities in the life course: An empirical test of a subjective expected utility explanation

Abstract: The objective of this paper is to integrate the idea of Pygmalion or self-fulfilling prophecy research into the subjective expected utility framework of inequality in educational opportunities. The theoretical section develops a formal model about the impact of teachers' expectations on students' educational transitions in sense of a self-fulfilling prophecy. In the empirical section, I test this model to predict both students' educational success (in terms of high school graduations) and their university tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(200 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result thus shows that there are direct expectancy effects on the development of students' educational aspirations. These effects might in turn explain the teacher expectancy effects on students' actual educational or career choices and attainment that were documented in previous studies (Becker, 2013;Byun et al, 2017;Gregory & Huang, 2013;Samel et al, 2011;Smith et al, 1999;Van Houtte & Demanet, 2016;Wu & Bai, 2015). Future studies might therefore test whether Subjective well-being is another important life outcome.…”
Section: Broadness and Uniqueness Of Teacher Expectancy Effectsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result thus shows that there are direct expectancy effects on the development of students' educational aspirations. These effects might in turn explain the teacher expectancy effects on students' actual educational or career choices and attainment that were documented in previous studies (Becker, 2013;Byun et al, 2017;Gregory & Huang, 2013;Samel et al, 2011;Smith et al, 1999;Van Houtte & Demanet, 2016;Wu & Bai, 2015). Future studies might therefore test whether Subjective well-being is another important life outcome.…”
Section: Broadness and Uniqueness Of Teacher Expectancy Effectsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Second, taking students’ cognitive ability as a starting point (see Good et al, 2018), research on teacher expectancy effects has largely focused on school performance (e.g., Alvidrez & Weinstein, 1999; C. N. Baker et al, 2015; Becker, 2013; de Boer et al, 2010; Gentrup et al, 2020; Gregory & Huang, 2013; Hinnant et al, 2009; Madon et al, 1997; McKown & Weinstein, 2002, 2008; Peterson et al, 2016; Rubie-Davies et al, 2006, 2014; Smith et al, 1999; Sorhagen, 2013; Stang & Urhahne, 2016). Although some work included effects on psychosocial outcomes such as ability self-concepts, interests, test anxiety, and school-related self-esteem (e.g., Jussim, 1989; Rubie-Davies, 2006; Weinstein, 1976; Zhou & Urhahne, 2013; see also S.…”
Section: Research On Teacher Expectancy Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of classroom, school, neighborhood, and institutional factors on teachers' expectations RM/20/012 ISSN: 2666-8807 Introduction Teachers represent a crucial dimension of social stratification in the school system. They matter by exerting short-term effects on students' motivational development (Dietrich, Dicke, Kracke et al 2015) and achievement (Jussim andHarber 2005, Rosenthal andJacobson 1968), but also in a longer run by shaping students' life chances in terms of educational transition propensities (Becker 2013) or labormarket income Rockoff 2014, Chetty, Friedman, Rockoff et al 2014).…”
Section: Dominik Becker Katarina Wesslingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers represent a crucial dimension of social stratification in the school system. They matter by exerting short-term effects on students' motivational development (Dietrich, Dicke, Kracke et al 2015) and achievement (Jussim andHarber 2005, Rosenthal andJacobson 1968), but also in a longer run by shaping students' life chances in terms of educational transition propensities (Becker 2013) or labormarket income Rockoff 2014, Chetty, Friedman, Rockoff et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%