The impact of territory of origin on product authenticity perceptions

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the importance of territory of origin (TOO) associations for consumers' perception of product authenticity and empirically tests the chain of effects, from TOO associations to perceived authenticity, and to consumers' self-brand connections. Design/methodology/approach -An experimental method and a partial least square approach were adopted. Hypotheses were tested on data collected across 665 Chinese consumers. Findings -Results demonstrate that TOO exerts a positive impact on perceived product authenticity, which in turn leads to stronger consumers' self-brand connections. In addition, compared with country of origin (COO) information, TOO has a unique positive impact on perceived authenticity and a direct positive effect on consumers' self-brand connections. Also, the positive impact of TOO on perceived authenticity is enhanced through consumers' familiarity with the TOO and through congruence between the product category and the TOO. Research limitations/implications -One possible outcome of TOO (perceived authenticity) and one product category (lavender soap) were considered in this study. Originality/value -Given the diminishing relevance of COO associations, this study demonstrates that TOO is an appealing alternative strategy for strengthening brand equity.

The influence of brand experience on brand authenticity and brand love: an empirical study from Asian consumers’ perspective

“…Authenticity is the individual's opinion of what is true, real or genuine (Beverland, 2005; Grayson and Martinec, 2004; Southworth and Ha-Brookshire, 2016). Authenticity has two approaches that are emphasized in the literature: (1) an objective approach that helps the consumers by providing information to assess the authenticity in a brand (Beverland, 2005; Grayson and Martinec, 2004; Zhang and Merunka, 2015). (2) In the subjective approach, authenticity is created as being influenced by consumers’ interests, knowledge, personal tastes and interpretation (Napoli et al , 2014).…”

Do global brands contribute to the economy of their country of origin? A dynamic spatial approach

“…As previously stated, several empirical studies support the opinion that a brand’s origin counts when consumers decide whether to buy a product presented as a particular brand (Diamantopoulos et al , 2011; Winit et al , 2014; Zhang and Merunka, 2015; Haliakias et al , 2016; Kim and Park, 2017). For instance, when looking for the underlying reason for the importance of global brands, Pecotich and Ward (2007) found that developed countries such as Japan, Germany and the USA are associated by global consumers with high-value brands and consequently high-quality products, whereas newly developing nations with a lower level of recognition are associated with poorer-quality products.…”

What drives green persistence intentions?

“…The concept of authenticity defined as the interpretation of the genuineness and increased appreciation of the tourism object (Chambers, 2009) plays a significant role in destination competitiveness (Ramkissoon and Uysal, 2010, 2011). Lin et al (2017) and Zhang and Merunka (2015) indicate that authenticity can serve as a boundary condition on customer evaluations and behaviors. Gaytán (2008, p. 315) argues that “consumption serves as a means through which authenticity becomes a measure of the quality, efficacy and legitimacy of one’s experience in a particular setting.” Lalicic and Weismayer (2017) focus on whether the authenticity of perceptions of whether to stay or not to stay at a hotel feel like “living the local life.” Birinci et al (2018) propose that perceived authenticity plays a key role in customer decision-making processes when determining accommodation and repurchase intentions.…”