2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1344805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36 While the success rate of applications to the House of Lords for leave to appeal in human rights cases is high, only one in three results in a victory on the merits for the original applicant. 37 The Human Rights Act is, however, referred to in about a third of House of Lords cases although only substantially affects the results in about one-tenth. 38 Another type of misconception stems from often outrageous challenges to administrative decisions, ostensibly on human rights grounds, which ultimately fail precisely because they are outrageous.…”
Section: Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 While the success rate of applications to the House of Lords for leave to appeal in human rights cases is high, only one in three results in a victory on the merits for the original applicant. 37 The Human Rights Act is, however, referred to in about a third of House of Lords cases although only substantially affects the results in about one-tenth. 38 Another type of misconception stems from often outrageous challenges to administrative decisions, ostensibly on human rights grounds, which ultimately fail precisely because they are outrageous.…”
Section: Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…161 Statistical surveys reveal that leave to appeal has been more readily granted by the House of Lords on human rights challenges, although these challenges were statistically less likely to succeed than other challenges. 162 Most UK judicial review challenges do now raise human rights issues. There remains concern that the CJEU prioritises commercial interests and the free movement provisions over fundamental human rights.…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Westminster-centred politics (the positions in Scotland and Northern Ireland being legally and politically very different), the Conservative Party -before it formed a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats in May 2010 -advocated repeal of the Human Rights Act (Norman and Oborne, 2009). The Law Lords, now recast as the new UK Supreme Court, have shown some ambivalence towards rights claims based on the Human Rights Act, as distinct from rights claims on other statutory and common law grounds (Hoffmann, 2009;Shah and Poole, 2009). The public sector response to the Human Rights Act has also been mixed.…”
Section: Human Rights As Legal Risk and Legal Risk+mentioning
confidence: 99%