2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-016-9378-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the institutional environment on the value relevance of fair values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reis and Stocken (2007), for example, obtain evidence that the informativeness of the accounting report is superior when using the fair value in comparison with the use of historical cost, since the first completely reveals the company's inventory level. Fiechter and Farkas (2017), on the other hand, demonstrate that it is the institutional differences between countries that affect the ability of investors to process and understand fair value information in their valuations, thus refuting the idea that valuation discounts in certain fair value assets arose from measurement errors or bias. For Sapra (2010) the benefit of using fair value would be the ability to better inform external users about the risks underlying the business, thus improving the assessment of investment decisions.…”
Section: Hierarchical Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reis and Stocken (2007), for example, obtain evidence that the informativeness of the accounting report is superior when using the fair value in comparison with the use of historical cost, since the first completely reveals the company's inventory level. Fiechter and Farkas (2017), on the other hand, demonstrate that it is the institutional differences between countries that affect the ability of investors to process and understand fair value information in their valuations, thus refuting the idea that valuation discounts in certain fair value assets arose from measurement errors or bias. For Sapra (2010) the benefit of using fair value would be the ability to better inform external users about the risks underlying the business, thus improving the assessment of investment decisions.…”
Section: Hierarchical Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address investors' information assessment, we focus on institutional differences within the EU and investigate their influence on the value relevance of Level 3 fair values. In order to do so, we cluster countries in market-based and bank-based economies (Ali and Hwang, 2000, Beck and Levine, 2002, and Fiechter and Novotny-Farkas, 2014).…”
Section: Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, Skinner (1996) critically hints that several fair values disclosures can limit the ability of market participants to properly process fair value information in their valuation. Fiechter and Novotny-Farkas (2014) investigate extent factors in determining the value relevance of recognized fair values of different fair value categories and find evidence for that objection, specifically, that investors' ability to properly process fair value information depends on the country-specific level of market sophistication and information environment. We provide a holistic evidence for Skinner's objection and apply it to the fair value hierarchy, distinguishing between market-based and bankbased economies, based on their comparative size and activity of the stock market relative to banks (Beck andLevine, 2002, Fiechter andNovotny-Farkas, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the practice of financial analysis, there are several methods for determining the discount rate, for example, the CAPM model, cumulative approach, etc (Espinoza, 2014;Fiechter & Novotny-Farkas, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%