The impact of the mass media on obstetricians’ behavior in Norway

Abstract

Little is known about how physicians and hospitals respond to the risk of being negatively exposed in the mass media. We assume that newspapers will cover events more closely in the areas where they have most of their circulation. Within such areas the likelihood of negative publicity increases. The research question is whether obstetricians respond to negative newspaper coverage by choosing the least risky method of delivery, i.e. Caesarean section. This was tested on a large set of data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway for the period 2000-2011. The Registry contains detailed medical information about all deliveries, for both the mother and the infant. This set of data was merged with a set of data that contained information about newspaper coverage for the municipalities in which all hospitals were located. Altogether, more than 620 000 deliveries in 46 municipalities were included in the study. The data were analyzed using a hospital 3 fixed effects regression. The main result was that newspaper coverage had a significant positive effect on the probability of having a Caesarean section. Several supplementary analyses supported the main finding. Altogether, our results indicate that obstetricians are sensitive to the risk of being exposed in the mass media. This is likely to be because obstetricians care about their reputation.

Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies

“…47,48 Being sued (even if unsuccessfully) can generate negative publicity, damage reputations and professional confidence, and even destroy careers. [50][51][52][53] This situation may result in performing a CS for professional protection, rather than to benefit the mother and/or baby. 54 In some settings, most CS operations occur during working hours, and during weekdays, peaking on Fridays.…”

What would reduce caesarean section rates?—Views from pregnant women and clinicians in Ireland

“…The same authors repeated the study in Spain, on 1223 articles, with similar results, showing that less than 5% of the papers reported placenta praevia in the next pregnancy, infection or haemorrhage as side effects of CS [ 11 ]. A similar review explored the depiction of CS in 81 articles, 10 videos, six birth shows, two informational leaflets and one scientific paper across three countries whose CS rates were high (56%, in Cyprus), medium (36%, in Italy) and low (16%, in Iceland) [ 12 ]. The authors found that in Iceland, the media focus was on midwife-led care and normal birth, whereas in Cyprus and Italy, the media focussed more on the need to reduce the high rates of CS.…”

The first survey on defensive medicine among Iranian surgeons: prevalence and its related factors

“…A study in Norway showed that gynecologists were susceptible to exposure to media since they cared for their reputation. These surgeons tended to be more likely to pursue defensive behaviors when the probability of negative promotions increased [34].…”