Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. The Defense Acquisition Review Journal (ARJ) is a scholarly peer-reviewed journal published by the Defense Acquisition University (DAU). All submissions receive a blind review to ensure impartial evaluation.
REPORT DATE
JAN 20102
Eduard H. Boyd Director, DAU Visual Arts & Press
Frances Battle Production Manager
Harambee DennisPre-press Production Manager
67After three years of parallel research and application efforts aimed at enabling pre-Milestone A cost analysis, the time investment has produced dividends of progress and lessons learned for a team of Army researchers. Clearly, early acquisition investment decisions must be costinformed, and the demand for this early cost information is growing. Although concrete tools are being developed to enable the analysis to support early investment decisions, it will not be achievable without an analysis culture with the policy, procedure, and willingness to develop and/or accept cost estimates that are less precise than those developed at Milestone B or Milestone C. Making early analysis a reality will require large-scale, departmentwide culture change within and around the analysis community.This article examines the legislation leading up to the Small Business Act of 1953 and the resulting implementation of congressionally mandated small business goals; industry's support of small business initiatives; government oversight of small business plans; and the sometimes improper interpretation of rules and regulations affecting the Small Business Program (SBP). The combination of mandated goals, improper interpretation of regulations, and the resulting negative effect on large businesses may, as supported by the author's research, be significant factors in the program's demise. Also included are suggestions on how the federal SBP can become a viable program that benefits small businesses so they truly receive an equitable share of government dollars without infringing on supply chain initiatives of large business contractors.The Demise of the Federal Government Small Business Program Philip G. Bail Jr.
77
Table of ConTenTs
DEFENSE ACQUISITION REVIEW JOURNALThe need for technological innovation in the U.S. Army is continually increasing. The challenge is to instit...