The impact of the performance measurement system on the organizational performance of the public sector in a transition economy: Is public accountability a missing link?

Tran, Yen; Nguyen, Nguyen Phong

doi:10.1080/23311975.2020.1792669

Cited by 19 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a well-functioning state, the government is subject to good accountability obtained from outside, for example from citizens (vertical), as well as accountability through public institutions empowered to oversee accountability or accountability (horizontally). This is in line with the statement put forward by (Tran & Nguyen, 2020) which states that the participation of stakeholder institutions will be able to create the achievement of public accountability. Transparency is achieved by involving stakeholders in organizational activities (Cetindamar, 2018).…”

Section: B Literature Review 1 Accountabilitysupporting

confidence: 86%

The Effect of Leadership and Motivation in Measuring Accountability Using the Calibrating Public Accountability Model (CPA Model)

Kustinah

Anggionaldi

2021

IJSOC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of school aid funds (BOS) must be accounted for by the beneficiary schools. The performance of a school can be judged by how good the accountability of the school is. The principal plays an important role in realizing accountability in the school he leads. The principal's leadership and motivation are factors that can encourage the achievement of good school accountability. This study aims to determine the effect of leadership and motivation in measuring accountability using the CPA (Calibrating Public Accountability Model) measurement model. The research method used is quantitative verification. The population in this study were all school principals in West Bandung Regency and Cimahi City with the sample technique using a simple random technique. Data collection techniques using questionnaires. Data analysis technique using PLS. The results showed that there was an effect of leadership on accountability, while motivation had no effect on accountability. Simultaneously leadership and motivation affect accountability.

show abstract

Section: B Literature Review 1 Accountabilitysupporting

confidence: 86%

The Effect of Leadership and Motivation in Measuring Accountability Using the Calibrating Public Accountability Model (CPA Model)

Kustinah

Anggionaldi

2021

IJSOC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This relates to the broader discourse on Performance Management Systems (PMS) and Performance Measurement and Management (PMM). Tran and Nguyen (2020) highlighted the importance of modern PMS in improving public accountability and organizational performance, particularly in developing countries like Vietnam. They advocate for implementing performance measurements that address quantitative and qualitative aspects, which resonates with the objective and measurable outcomes emphasized within the PPBER.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact Assessment of Program Performance and Budget Execution Review of the Department of National Defense - Office Proper: Basis for Effective Tool in Measuring Accomplishments

Anthony D. Rana

2024

IJRP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Performance measurement in government agencies is essential for always ensuring accountability and transparency. This process is essential in determining the efficiency and effectiveness of the government's programs and projects. That is why timely and relevant performance measurement practices must be in place to provide the necessary information and data accurately and produce more informed decision-making that impacts the overall accomplishment of government agencies.This study focuses on the assessment of the efficacy and timeliness of the Program Performance and Budget Execution Review of DND -Office Proper in terms of its guidelines, templates, formats, and methods of reporting. It aims to contribute to the list of studies and scholarly works on identifying and developing an effective and efficient model for Performance Measurement Practices. This study utilizes quantitative methodology through a descriptive research design. The researcher distributed the survey questionnaires to 50 personnel from the Office for Financial Management, Office for Plans and Programs, Office for Huma Resource, and Administrative Service of the DND -Office Proper.Analysis revealed that the quality of data and information in the PPBER based on the Performance Measurement Practices Framework of Hamspson and Best (2005) significantly impacts the effective decisionmaking process, the continuous development of organizational learning, and the promotion of transparency and accountability. Further, it enhances the effective implementation of the PPBER in measuring the performance and accomplishment of the DND-Office Proper.In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the impact of the Program Performance and Budget Execution Review of the DND-Office as a tool for measuring accomplishments. PPBER promotes accountability and transparency through its clear and concise objectives and rigorous process for reporting and documenting data and information relevant to performance measurement. This study also contributes to the advancement of Performance Measurement Practices in the Philippine Government and exploration toward developing a responsive assessment and evaluation tool.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, providing capacity building on adoption of SPPM may enlighten some key county government political stakeholders on the kind of information on county government performance that will be in the public domain. Tran and Nguyen (2020) argued that sharing result-based performance measurement information to the public may necessitate changes in resource allocation, budgeting and even personal political ambitions which might not be supported by some political leaders. Also, an effective PMS was found to put pressure on public organization to perform better (Tran & Nguyen, 2020).…”

Section: Sppm Adoption In County Governmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictors of strategic procurement performance metrics adoption in county governments: empirical evidence from Kakamega county government, Kenya

Odongo,

Kazungu

2023

LBSJMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeAmidst the scarcity of resources, it is undisputable that an effective public procurement performance measurement system (PMS) is required particularly in county governments, especially for Kenya to realize its ambitions in devolved governance system. County governments cannot be effectively evaluated on their performance if the long-term, strategic impact of public procurement processes and projects is not captured. Arising from this backdrop, this study aims to determine the predictors of strategic procurement performance metrics (SPPM) adoption in public procurement PMS of county governments.Design/methodology/approachAnchored on institutional theory and public sector scorecard model, a survey research design was adopted where data were collected through census from 115 respondents working in procurement, finance and stores department of Kakamega county government. Data were collected using questionnaire (75.56% response rate) and key informant interviews, and analyzed by using multiple regression model and ordinal logistic regression models.FindingsMultiple regression model and ordinal logistics regression revealed that national government support negatively and significantly, and regulatory framework positively and significantly affects the adoption of SPPM.Practical implicationsThere is need for formal mechanism that will enable the national government in partnership with the council of governors to be proactively involved in developing procurement performance measurement capacity of county governments. This study’s findings also provide suggestions for a working regulatory framework required for the adoption of SPPM by county governments.Originality/valueThis work adds value to the prevailing body of knowledge on public procurement PMS in the public sector.

show abstract

The impact of the performance measurement system on the organizational performance of the public sector in a transition economy: Is public accountability a missing link?

Cited by 19 publications

References 65 publications

The Effect of Leadership and Motivation in Measuring Accountability Using the Calibrating Public Accountability Model (CPA Model)

The Effect of Leadership and Motivation in Measuring Accountability Using the Calibrating Public Accountability Model (CPA Model)

Impact Assessment of Program Performance and Budget Execution Review of the Department of National Defense - Office Proper: Basis for Effective Tool in Measuring Accomplishments

Predictors of strategic procurement performance metrics adoption in county governments: empirical evidence from Kakamega county government, Kenya

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About