2020 IEEE 28th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icnp49622.2020.9259407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Physical Layer on the Performance of Concurrent Transmissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The appropriate physical layer should be considered when developing an IoT application to ensure the highest QoS. The impact is even more prominent in the case of CT-based communications [11].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate physical layer should be considered when developing an IoT application to ensure the highest QoS. The impact is even more prominent in the case of CT-based communications [11].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach relies fully on broadcasts (no acknowledgements) and uses shorter TSCH slots. Baddeley et al [2] present a hybrid between TSCH and synchronous transmissions by replacing some TSCH slots with synchronously transmitted BLE packets for exchanging control information.…”
Section: Synchronous Transmissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whereas for a survey of CT-based protocols and the underlying physical layer phenomena underpinning CT we refer to [7,9,13,14].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were run with the nRF52840 platform on the D-Cube [10] testbed. For the purposes of this paper, 6PP uses a modified version of the Atomic-SDN CT scheduling architecture [19], which has recently been extended to support CT-based protocols over the four BT 5 PHY layers [9] and incorporates recent nRF52840 support from Contiki-NG 1 . However, the 6PP approach could also be replicated on other CT scheduling architectures such as Baloo [18].…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation