2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40489-022-00301-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Presence of Intellectual Disabilities on Sensory Processing and Behavioral Outcomes Among Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: a Systematic Review

Abstract: Background Autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability (ID) are linked to atypical sensory processing, but consensus lacks on the impact of their co-occurrence. We studied the impact of the presence of ID in autistic individuals on (1) sensory processing and (2) the relation between sensory processing and behavioral outcomes. Methods A systematic review was performed on English-language peer-reviewed studies. Results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with an ID diagnosis exhibited poor registration and increased seeking behaviors. The extant literature on sensory processing in ASD and co-occurring ID includes contradictory findings (see review: Werkman et al, 2022 ). For instance, a prior study conflicted with the current results, such that there were no differences in either registration or seeking quadrants between ASD with ID diagnoses versus ID diagnosis alone, but there were differences to the other two quadrants (Joosten & Bundy, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with an ID diagnosis exhibited poor registration and increased seeking behaviors. The extant literature on sensory processing in ASD and co-occurring ID includes contradictory findings (see review: Werkman et al, 2022 ). For instance, a prior study conflicted with the current results, such that there were no differences in either registration or seeking quadrants between ASD with ID diagnoses versus ID diagnosis alone, but there were differences to the other two quadrants (Joosten & Bundy, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%