2017
DOI: 10.11643/issn.2217-995x171sps80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the refugee crisis in the Balkans: A drift towards security

Abstract: During the course of approximately one year - from early 2015 until March 2016 - over 800,000 people crossed four countries on the Western Balkan route: Macedonia, Serbia, Croatia and Slovenia. These countries' ability to organize the refugees' transit in an orderly manner was described as a humanitarian approach. Due to the transit nature of the passage of the refugees, the crisis could have been seen as having little impact on the countries beyond technical issues like registration, accommodation and transpo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the securitization of migration and the blooming research of migration as a security topic in the past two decades (Buzan, Waever, and de Wilde 1998;Huysmans 2000;Šabić 2017).…”
Section: O N L I N E F I R S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the securitization of migration and the blooming research of migration as a security topic in the past two decades (Buzan, Waever, and de Wilde 1998;Huysmans 2000;Šabić 2017).…”
Section: O N L I N E F I R S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Route “extend[s] from the Eastern Mediterranean Route going from Turkey through Greece, the countries of former Yugoslavia, continuing through to Hungary in the North and Austria in the West” (Ilievski and Tasev, 2019: 59–60). Scholarship on the most recent iterations of the Route has focused principally on the first phases of the “long summer of migration” (Ilievski and Serbos, 2016), and the role of external actors such as Turkey (Engler, 2019; Tsarouhas, 2019) in negotiating policy solutions aimed at governing migration along the route.Other work has examined how the Route’s formal “closure” in 2016, and informal re-opening, have impacted Western Balkan countries, with a progressive shift from humanitarian to securitized responses to migration (Prodromidou et al., 2019; Šelo Šabić, 2017; Sicurella, 2017; Zaragoza-Cristiani, 2017) noting how the securitization of migration contributed to turning the Western Balkans into a de facto buffer-area, or a series of “transit-countries”, to which the management of the refugee crisis could be outsourced. Scholars have also focused on the intersections between the securitization of international migration and humanitarian discourses along the Route (see Galijaš, 2019; Pallister-Wilkins, 2018, 2021).…”
Section: Understanding the Balkan Routementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first phase of the migrant crisis in Serbia was marked by a rather quick transit of migrants, who were entering Serbia in a small town on the Serbian–Macedonian border and leaving toward Hungary or Croatia as soon as possible, often in less than 72 hr. Lured by initial “refugees welcome” policy (Šelo Šabić, 2017) of some EU Member States, migrants were not applying for asylum in Serbia, but only transiting toward more desirable countries of destination in Western Europe. To meet migrants’ basic needs, Serbia significantly improved its reception capacities with the help of international donors, by opening numerous reception centers throughout the country (UNHCR, 2017, p. 1).…”
Section: The Emergence Of Ontological Insecurity During the Migrant C...mentioning
confidence: 99%