The impact of the “RunSmart” running programme on participant motivation, attendance and well-being using self-determination theory as a theoretical framework

Integrating models of self-regulation and optimal experiences: A qualitative study into flow and clutch states in recreational distance running

“…In comparing flow and SDT, Deci and Ryan (2000) suggested that the basic needs of autonomy and relatedness, which were described as motives by some runners in our study, did not align with initial understanding of flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975). Given that flow occurred when participants were optimally challenged and had a feeling of confidence, there appears to be a relationship between flow and in-the-moment psychological need satisfaction, which may have implications for runners' wellbeing (Johnson et al, 2020) and long-term adherence (Stevinson et al, 2015).…”

“…As running is a relatively inexpensive, accessible form of PA for many adults (Hulteen et al, 2017), it could be a promising approach to increase PA. However, evidence suggests about one-third of novice runners drop out of running programmes within six months (Fokkema et al, 2019), and, in some instances, almost two-thirds have dropped out within 10 weeks (Johnson et al, 2020). Therefore, the development of innovative strategies that help to promote more sustained participation could help to maximise the health benefits and longevity associated with running behaviour (e.g., Pedisic et al, 2020).…”