2022
DOI: 10.1002/eat.23822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on eating disorders in U.S. military veterans

Abstract: Purpose The COVID‐19 pandemic has had a profound impact on mental health around the world. Although there have been reports that the incidence of eating disorders (EDs) has increased during the pandemic, few longitudinal studies have examined recent changes in EDs. Men and women with military histories may be particularly vulnerable to EDs, underscoring the importance of investigating the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on EDs in this population. Method We examined whether early‐pandemic (Time 1; T1) posttraum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We administered the version of the PCL-5 that asks participants to provide information about their worst trauma, which is used to determine whether participants met PTSD Criterion A for trauma exposure. As previously reported (Mitchell et al, 2023), we created two PCL-5 scores, one for participants who endorsed Criterion A trauma exposure according to DSM-5 criteria, and a second sum score that included these participants and those endorsing exposures that may have qualified as trauma but had insufficient detail to confirm whether it met Criterion A. PCL-5 sum scores based on such strict and lenient coding were correlated at .91; we used the lenient scoring in this study to be more inclusive. Participants who did not report an index trauma exposure or reported a non-Criterion A trauma were excluded from the analyses.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We administered the version of the PCL-5 that asks participants to provide information about their worst trauma, which is used to determine whether participants met PTSD Criterion A for trauma exposure. As previously reported (Mitchell et al, 2023), we created two PCL-5 scores, one for participants who endorsed Criterion A trauma exposure according to DSM-5 criteria, and a second sum score that included these participants and those endorsing exposures that may have qualified as trauma but had insufficient detail to confirm whether it met Criterion A. PCL-5 sum scores based on such strict and lenient coding were correlated at .91; we used the lenient scoring in this study to be more inclusive. Participants who did not report an index trauma exposure or reported a non-Criterion A trauma were excluded from the analyses.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Older age was associated with a lower risk, and heavier body mass was associated with a higher risk, of eating disorders. Common mental disorders are strongly associated with eating disorders (8–11) and may lead to eating disorders (12,13). Therefore, our data could be explained by the observation that older age was also associated with a lower risk, and heavier body mass was associated with a higher risk, of symptoms of anxiety, depression, and/or stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common mental disorders were assessed using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) (38), the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (39), the Perceived Stress Scale (40), and 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) (41). Anxiety and depression were scored according to severity using the respective GAD-7 (minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), severe (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)) and PHQ-9 scores (minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), moderately severe (15)(16)(17)(18)(19), severe (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)). A participant was defined as having symptoms of anxiety if they scored ≥10 on the GAD-7 (38) and depression if they scored ≥10 on the PHQ-9 (39).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EPII was designed to assess COVID-19 pandemic stressors with regard to different life domains. Given the lack of standard scoring metrics, we used a revised scoring procedure as outlined in Mitchell et al (2023), which included slight modifications to scoring of the education and training, physical health problems, and distancing and quarantine stressor domains. A list of the items included under each domain are in supplemental Table S1.…”
Section: Covid Impact (Timepoint 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%