2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the socioeconomic environment on the implementation of control measures against an invasive forest pathogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates a contrasting socioeconomic context in Turkey. However, the primacy of income potential was also a major factor in a similar study in Catalonia [12]. Our research has arrived at a similar result.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates a contrasting socioeconomic context in Turkey. However, the primacy of income potential was also a major factor in a similar study in Catalonia [12]. Our research has arrived at a similar result.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…What can be implemented by smallholders and forest officers are simple sanitation measures such as limb removal and destruction, and elimination of dead and dying vegetative material [10]. Though some studies in the European context have looked at dynamics of land-owner interest in biological control measures [11,12], very few studies have investigated the effects of small-scale household blight mitigation efforts [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mismatches between observations in diseased areas and NFI data have been reported also previously. For instance, work on Cryphonectria parasitica and sweet chestnut in Spain showed contrasting results when comparing high incidence in managed stands with NFI data; the results indicated that instead of declining, chestnut population was increasing in volume, likely due to management abandonment of coppice stands 33 . www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Additionally, the records showed that some ash trees had been removed from the stands, although there was no information concerning the purpose of the removals and whether they were part of a management plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agent sub-model: landowner behavior Forest owners are identified as primary agents of forest ecosystem services provision (Sotirov et al 2019). The literature on private forest owners shows that their decision-making process with regard to the management of their forests is not only based on economic factors, but also includes feelings of moral responsibility and pride (Oliva et al 2016). Moreover, others have argued that the intention of forest owners is to do "good" in their forests (Domínguez and Shannon 2011).…”
Section: Structural Sub-model: Pes Policy Designmentioning
confidence: 99%