2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair on Long-Term Survival in Type B Aortic Dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
47
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented data compare favorably with the mortality rates reported by other recent studies. 11,12,[14][15][16][17] The 2-year overall survival rate was 93% for those with acute uncomplicated TBAD and 83% for those with all other categories of TBAD. The unifying feature of the patients with a statistically significant decrease in their freedom from all-cause mortality (acute complicated TBAD, chronic complicated TBAD, and chronic uncomplicated TBAD) presumably resulted from the presence of a complicated presentation, because most physicians would not treat a truly uncomplicated chronic dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presented data compare favorably with the mortality rates reported by other recent studies. 11,12,[14][15][16][17] The 2-year overall survival rate was 93% for those with acute uncomplicated TBAD and 83% for those with all other categories of TBAD. The unifying feature of the patients with a statistically significant decrease in their freedom from all-cause mortality (acute complicated TBAD, chronic complicated TBAD, and chronic uncomplicated TBAD) presumably resulted from the presence of a complicated presentation, because most physicians would not treat a truly uncomplicated chronic dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Stroke and SCI occurred at lower rates than recently reported. [10][11][12] The most common AE was endoleak. However, the presence of an endoleak was not associated with a decrease in survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of TEVAR revolutionized the treatment of TBAD with aneurysmal degeneration, but false lumen patency remains a problem and often requires reintervention to prevent late aortic rupture and death. [6][7][8] Dongze and Cao 13 reported a hazard ratio of 2.79 in TEVAR treatment of TBAD with residual false lumen patency. Patent false lumens confer a fivefold increased risk of any aortic event compared with thrombosed false lumens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 As many as 15% to 30% of patients undergoing TEVAR require reintervention. [6][7][8] Approximately 20% of these patients require reintervention because of false lumen perfusion and increasing aortic growth and degeneration. 6,9,10 Lack of false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodeling after TEVAR can increase late mortality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review concluded that the long-term results of BMT alone for the treatment of uncomplicated type B dissection were inferior to those of the complicated type and showed a high frequency of surgical intervention. 49 Based on these evidences, TEVAR for acute TBAD is listed as the first-line treatment option in the ESVS guidelines. 21 Chronic TBAD, including a residual dissection after repair of an acute type A dissection, is defined as "chronic" when 2 weeks have elapsed from the onset.…”
Section: Acute and Chronic Type B Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%