2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2004.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of tidal straining on the cycle of turbulence in a partially stratified estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data collected from a number of ROFIs and estuarine systems have found evidence for the tidal straining mechanism. Examples include Liverpool Bay (Simpson et al 1990), the Rhine ROFI (Fisher et al 2002) and the York estuary (Simpson et al 2005). Simpson and Souza (1995) studied the semi-diurnal switching of stratification in the Rhine ROFI and concluded that this semi-diurnal variation resulted from crossshore tidal straining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collected from a number of ROFIs and estuarine systems have found evidence for the tidal straining mechanism. Examples include Liverpool Bay (Simpson et al 1990), the Rhine ROFI (Fisher et al 2002) and the York estuary (Simpson et al 2005). Simpson and Souza (1995) studied the semi-diurnal switching of stratification in the Rhine ROFI and concluded that this semi-diurnal variation resulted from crossshore tidal straining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the flood tide phase, the vertical structure becomes homogeneous. The modulation of increasing the stratification in the ebb period and the mixing during the flood phase is explained by the tidal straining (e.g., SIMPSON et al, 2004). Considering the oscillatory tidal flow, the water displacement on the surface will be higher due to the near bottom bed shear, resulting in slower near bed currents.…”
Section: Hydrological Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fit of the net southward velocities between the simulation results and the conceptual model of the response outlined above is excellent (R 2 5 0.78, based on 65 vertical cells and model output every 12 h; n 5 3315), indicating that the circulation in the lake interior can be predominantly described as the superposition of a simple seiche and convective circulation. Substituting the peak convective circulation velocity into (5), we return an effective turbulent eddy viscosity of 1.6 3 10 3 m 2 s 21 , which appears to be reasonable based on observation during slack-water periods in estuaries (Lu and Lueck 1999;Simpson et al 2005) and numerical simulations in lakes (Wang 2003). It also allows us to compute a spin-up time T 5 h 2 /v for the circulation, which for a 100-m-deep layer and the above value of n gives a spin-up time of 70 d. This matches well with the approximate time to spin-up of the convective circulation determined visually from Fig.…”
Section: Ra~bmentioning
confidence: 99%